Comparison of Anatomical and Indication-Based Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in Head CT Imaging: Implications for Radiation Dose Management

TL;DR

This study compares radiation dose benchmarks for head CT scans based on anatomy versus medical conditions, showing that condition-specific benchmarks are more accurate for managing radiation exposure.

Contribution

The study quantifies discrepancies between anatomical and indication-based DRLs in head CT imaging, advocating for indication-based DRLs for better radiation dose management.

Findings

Anatomical-based DLP DRLs underestimate head injury/trauma DLP values by up to 30% in single-phase CT.

Anatomical-based DLP DRLs overestimate stroke DLP values by up to 23.9%.

Brain tumor/ISOL DLP values are underestimated by up to 71.8% using anatomical DRLs.

Abstract

Introduction: Many diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in computed tomography (CT) imaging are based mainly on anatomical locations and often overlook variations in radiation exposure due to different clinical indications. While indication-based DRLs, derived from dose descriptors like volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP), are recommended for optimising patient radiation exposure, many studies still use anatomical-based DRL values. This study is aimed at quantifying the differences between anatomical and indication-based DRL values in head CT imaging and assessing its implications for radiation dose management. This will support the narrative when explaining the distinction between indication-based DRLs and anatomical DRLs for patients' dose management.

Methods: Employing a retrospective quantitative study design, we developed and compared anatomical and common indication-based DRL values using a dataset of head CT scans with similar characteristics. The indications included in the study were brain tumor/intracranial space-occupying lesion (ISOL), head injury/trauma, stroke, and anatomical examinations. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 29.

Results: The findings suggest that using anatomical-based DLP DRL values for CT head examinations leads to underestimations in the median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile values of head injury/trauma by 20.2%, 30.0%, and 14.5% in single-phase CT head procedures. Conversely, for the entire examination, using anatomical-based DLP DRL as a benchmark for CT stroke DRL overestimates median, 25th percentile, and 75th percentile values by 18.3%, 23.9%, and 13.5%. Brain tumor/ISOL DLP values are underestimated by 62.6%, 60.4%, and 71.8%, respectively.

Conclusion:The study highlights that using anatomical DLP DRL values for specific indications in head CT scans can lead to underestimated or overestimated DLP values, making them less reliable for radiation management compared to indication-based DRLs. Therefore, it is imperative to promote the establishment and use of indication-based DRLs for more accurate dose management in CT imaging.

Figures