# The Golden Year? Early Intervention Yields Superior Outcomes in Chronic Pelvic Pain with Pudendal Neuralgia: A Comparative Analysis of Early vs. Delayed Treatment

**Authors:** Alexandru Ciudin, Albert Carrion, Rosa Regue, Alfredo Rodriguez, Eduardo Garcia-Cruz, Diana Finkelstein, Claudia Mercader, Cristian Toma, Razvan Popescu, Cristian Persu, Sergi Colom, Narcis Camps, Ramon Serrate, María José Ribal

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/life15030376 · Life · 2025-02-27

## TL;DR

Treating pudendal neuralgia early leads to better pain relief and quality of life compared to delayed treatment.

## Contribution

This study demonstrates that early pudendal nerve infiltration improves outcomes more than delayed treatment in chronic pelvic pain.

## Key findings

- Early treatment reduced VAS scores by 5.4 points versus 3.4 in delayed treatment.
- Early intervention led to higher QoL improvements (18 vs. 8 points) and lower reinfiltration rates (10% vs. 35%).
- Patients treated early were more likely to discontinue medications like gabapentin and tramadol.

## Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) associated with pudendal neuralgia (PN) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL). Pudendal nerve infiltration is a recognized treatment, but the optimal timing of intervention remains unclear. Methods: This prospective study included 81 patients diagnosed with PN and treated with pudendal nerve infiltrations. Outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Spanish Pain Questionnaire (CDE–McGill), and the SF-12 health survey. Significant improvement was defined as a VAS reduction > 4 points and a QoL increase > 15 points. An ROC curve analysis identified a 13-month time-to-treatment threshold (sensitivity 78%, specificity 72%), categorizing patients into early (n = 27) and delayed treatment groups (n = 54). Results: The early treatment group showed significantly greater reductions in VAS scores (5.4 vs. 3.4 points, p < 0.01) and QoL improvements (18 vs. 8 points, p < 0.01) compared to the delayed group. Early intervention reduced reinfiltration rates (10% vs. 35%, p < 0.05) and decreased medication use, with 81% discontinuing gabapentin compared to 41% in the delayed group. Similar trends were observed for tryptizol (44% vs. 35%) and tramadol (74% vs. 30%). Multivariate analysis confirmed time to treatment as the strongest predictor of outcomes, with each additional month delaying treatment associated with a 0.18-point increase in final VAS scores (p < 0.001). Delayed treatment was linked to higher final doses of gabapentin (p = 0.01), dexketoprofen (p < 0.001), and tramadol (p = 0.012). Minimal complications were reported (15%, Clavien I). Conclusions: Early intervention in PN significantly improves pain, QoL, and reduces reinfiltration and medication reliance, supporting timely treatment for optimal outcomes.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** gabapentin (PubChem CID 3446), dexketoprofen (PubChem CID 667550), tramadol (PubChem CID 19472), tryptizol (PubChem CID 2160)
- **Diseases:** pudendal neuralgia (MONDO:0018957)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CPP (MESH:D011472), PN (MESH:D060545), Pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11944006/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11944006/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11944006/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11944006