# RETRACTION: Comparing the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Povidone–Iodine in Preventing Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70428 · International Wound Journal · 2025-03-26

## TL;DR

This retracted study compared chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine for preventing surgical site infections but was found to have used a compromised peer review process.

## Contribution

The paper's retraction highlights issues with the peer review process rather than presenting new scientific findings.

## Key findings

- The article was retracted due to a compromised peer review process.
- The authors did not respond to the retraction notice.
- The retraction was agreed upon by the journal editor and publisher.

## Abstract

RETRACTION:

BaiD.
, 
ZhouF.
, and 
WuL.
, “Comparing the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Povidone–Iodine in Preventing Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” International Wound Journal
21, no. 2 (2024): e14463, 10.1111/iwj.14463.PMC1082852437885342

The above article, published online on 27 October 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Chlorhexidine (PubChem CID 9552079), Povidone–Iodine (PubChem CID 410087)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Site Infections (MESH:D013530)
- **Chemicals:** Povidone-Iodine (MESH:D011206), Chlorhexidine (MESH:D002710)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943782/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943782