# Multiple Recessions Coverage Using the Modified Tunnel Technique and Connective Tissue Graft with or Without Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid: 2-Year Outcomes of RCT

**Authors:** Bartłomiej Górski, Izabela Maria Skierska, Andrea Gelemanović, Marija Roguljić, Darko Bozic

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jfb16030087 · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · 2025-03-04

## TL;DR

This study compared root coverage outcomes using a modified tunnel technique with or without hyaluronic acid over two years.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the long-term effectiveness of adding cross-linked hyaluronic acid to a root coverage procedure.

## Key findings

- Both groups achieved over 80% mean root coverage at 2 years with no significant difference between them.
- Significant improvements in recession height and clinical attachment were observed in both groups.
- Hyaluronic acid improved soft tissue texture but had minimal clinical relevance.

## Abstract

There is continuing interest in using biologics in root coverage procedures. The aim of the present study was to explore the 2-year outcomes following multiple gingival recessions (GRs) coverage using the application of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) in combination with modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) together with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Adopting a split-mouth design, 266 GRs were randomly allocated to either a test (MCAT + SCTG + HA) or control group (MCAT + SCTG). The main outcome variable was the stability of the obtained mean root coverage from 6 months to 24 months. Twenty-four patients were evaluated at the 2-year follow-up. Comparisons between test and control sides at the same time points were evaluated using the t-test for independent variables. The changes in time were compared by one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post hoc test separately for the test and control groups. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05045586). At 2 years, around ninety percent of recessions showed complete root coverage (87.02% of the test group and 91.90% of the control group). Mean root coverage did not differ between the two sides, with 81.37 ± 37.17% (test) and 84.63 ± 35.33% (control), respectively. Significant improvements in the reduction of gingival recession height, clinical attachment level gain, gingival thickness increase, and the root esthetic score were found in both groups after 2 years, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. The adjunctive application of HA significantly improved soft tissue texture (STT, 0.94 ± 0.23 for the test group vs. 0.71 ± 0.46 for the control group). Treatment of multiple gingival recessions with MCAT + SCTG with or without HA yielded marked and comparable 2-year clinical outcomes, which could be maintained over a period of 24 months. The clinical relevance of the demonstrated significant difference in STT between groups may be minimal.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** GRs (MESH:D005889)
- **Chemicals:** HA (MESH:D006820)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943361/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943361/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943361/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11943361