Sharing Milk and Knowledge in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Improves Care for Neonates in a Low- and Middle-Income Population—A North–South Collaboration
Kirsti Haaland, Srishti Goel, Gunjana Kumar, Ingvild Andresen Hurv, Isha Thapar, Jitesh Jalthuria, Sushma Nangia

TL;DR
A collaboration between Norway and India improved neonatal care in a low-income hospital by sharing knowledge and promoting breastfeeding, leading to lower mortality and better health outcomes.
Contribution
A locally customized quality improvement program reduced neonatal mortality and morbidity through international collaboration and improved basic care practices.
Findings
Neonatal mortality decreased from 11% in 2016 to 5.5% in 2019.
Human milk consumption in NICU increased from one third to more than three fourths of total intake.
Skin-to-skin contact hours and weight gain in neonates significantly improved.
Abstract
Background: Basic healthcare may significantly decrease neonatal morbidity and mortality. Attention to this, particularly in populations where rates of potentially preventable illness and death within the first weeks of life are extremely high, will have a positive impact on global health. Objective: This manuscript presents the development and impact of a quality improvement programme to reduce the evidence–practice gap in care for neonates admitted to the NICU in a public hospital in India. The programme was locally customised for optimal and sustainable results. Method: The backbone of the project was educational exchange of neonatal nurses and physicians between Norway and India. Areas of potential improvement in the care for the neonates were mainly identified by the clinicians and focus areas were subject to dynamic changes over time. In addition, a service centre for lactation…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6- —NOREC
- —Oslo University Hospital, Norway
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeonatal and Maternal Infections · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Infant Development and Preterm Care
1. Introduction
In 2019, 2.4 million children died in the neonatal period defined as the first 28 days of life [1]. The global neonatal mortality rate (NMR) was 17 deaths per 1000 live births that year. Corresponding numbers for India and Norway were 21.7 and 1.4, respectively [1]. Although NMRs have declined significantly since 1990, increased efforts are necessary to achieve the third Sustainable Development Goal “Good health and well-being” [2]. In many neonatal care units in low- and middle-income countries, basic care practice is suboptimal and a main underlying reason for acute and chronic morbidity and mortality. Interventions such as promoting early enteral feeding and intake of mother’s own milk (MOM), maintaining hand hygiene and both providing necessary and minimising irrational use of antibiotics, involvement of parents, and reducing the exposure to stress have been depicted to improve various neonatal outcome parameters [3].
The project entitled “Oslo-Delhi: Improve newborn care” [4] aimed to narrow the gap between theoretical knowledge and active practice of optimised neonatal basic care through collaboration across cultural and social contexts. The two key components were educational exchange of nurses and physicians between neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in New Delhi, India and Oslo, Norway, and establishing a lactation centre with a bank for human milk. The main goal of this Quality Improvement Initiative was to enhance the basic care of sick and premature neonates (Figure 1).
2. Methods
Target population and training setting: All neonates admitted to the 80 bedded, level III NICUs at Lady Hardinge Medical College and Kalawati Saran Children’s Hospital (LHMC and KSCH), New Delhi, India during the timeframe of January 2017 to December 2019. The 47 bedded level IV NICU at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway was the location for exchange. Neonates admitted to this hospital are not reported in this manuscript.
The framework for the project was constructed on a template provided by the Norwegian Agency for Exchange Cooperation, employing educational exchange for learning and development [6]. A total of 12 Indian nurses, 6 Indian physicians, and 9 Norwegian nurses spent 3–18 months at the foreign location in a 3-year relay. In addition, Norwegian resource personnel skilled in human milk banking, administration, education, neonatal care, and infection control participated as per the needs during various timeframes of the project.
Partners’ discussion and previous experience derived from a similar project involving Oslo University Hospital and JK Lone Hospital, Jaipur, India [7], identified the areas of potential improvements. This determined the objectives of the project. Focus areas and cost-effective ways to achieve quality improvements were sought by applying a patient-centred model of care, rather than the more traditional approach merely supporting the provision of services in keeping with established guidelines. “Participant observation” was the most important tool in facilitating collaboration for the continuous development and customisation of this dynamic project.
Empowerment and skills of health providers were enhanced by exposure to a wide range of patient scenarios and different settings to be handled in collaboration with foreign colleagues, and by theory sessions. The framework of the project was reviewed every year.
2.1. Education and Training
Areas of focus included nutrition, hygiene, pain management, kangaroo mother care (KMC), developmental supportive care (DSC), non-invasive mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, temperature control, teamwork, and maintenance of medical equipment (Supplement S1).
Collaborative task- and discussion-based learning were the main approaches. Indian and Norwegian health providers worked together bedside in the two countries’ NICUs, customising activities according to their individual strengths and skills. Patient management as well as different systems and infrastructure at the respective units were observed and discussed.
Teaching sessions and scenario trainings in small groups were frequently arranged, with “topic of the week” (Table 1). Most topics were repeated several weeks. Protocols and standard operational procedures customised to local conditions were constructed (Table 1).
During the tenure of 3 years, survey questions were answered twice by the participants. This provided information on their knowledge of different topics and the activities were modified accordingly (Supplement S2).
With the purpose to empower healthcare providers to continuously take appropriate actions on crucial improvement areas and to facilitate for sustainability, three inter-disciplinary study groups were established, with a primary focus on nutrition, hygiene and housekeeping, and DSC. They met approximately twice a month.
Seminars were conducted twice a year to educate the healthcare providers and equally important to enhance their teaching skills necessary for long term improvements. The last year this was expanded to a two-day seminar with participants and speakers also from outside the project [8].
2.2. Providing Human Milk
A comprehensive lactation management centre (CLMC), ‘Vatsalya Maatri Amrit Kosh’ (literal meaning: ‘a storehouse of mother’s unconditional love and nectar’), was established in the hospital to provide lactation support and to provide pasteurised donor human milk (PDHM) in cases where sufficient MOM is not available. To accomplish this, lactation counsellors and milk bank operators were engaged and trained, and facilities for collection of surplus milk from suitable mothers, processing, storage and dispersion PDHM were established [9] (Table 2).
Lactation counselling was offered to groups of women in all antenatal, maternity, neonatal, and some paediatric wards, with complementary individual sessions as and when required. Awareness of the benefits of human milk and (preferably exclusive) breastfeeding, practical assistance and ally of the women’s anxieties were addressed. Mothers of neonates not yet able to suckle directly on the breast due to prematurity or severe illness, were encouraged and helped to express their milk manually or via a breast pump to initiate and sustain production until their neonate managed to suckle. This expressed milk was fed to the infant by gavage or cup.
Women with surplus production were invited to donate to the milk bank. Neonates of GA < 32 weeks or weight < 1500 g were offered (if informed consent from the parents) PDHM as a bridge to support during the first two weeks of life, if MOM was insufficient.
Milk kitchens were set up in the neonatal units to organise thawing and distribution (and in some cases fortification) of PDHM and artificial formula in an aseptic manner.
2.3. Outcome Measures
Mortality rates among neonates admitted to the NICU were documented on monthly basis. Clinical as well as culture-proven sepsis and antibiotic utilisation rates (defined as the proportion of neonates that had received at least one kind of antibiotics to the total number of neonates discharged) were recorded on a daily basis. As quality indicators of neonatal care, nasal injuries due to non-invasive respiratory support and duration of KMC were documented by the nursing personnel in the bedside monitoring sheets. Quality of nutrition was assessed based on daily consumption of MOM, PDHM, and formula, respectively, in the ward, and by the weight change in the first two weeks of life recorded early in the project (2nd month) and repeated 2.5 years later.
Involved personnel reported their own activities and observations of the project’s impact every third month. These reports were utilised for unstructured and qualitative measures such as attitude towards changes, parental involvement, and effect of training (e.g., resuscitation and DSC).
Altered design and practice of physical and work environment such as logistics, teamwork, maintenance of equipment, and more, were noted.
The functionality of the human milk bank was followed through data on the amount of milk donated and that dispensed to the neonatal unit.
Statistical tools: p-values calculated using Pearson’s Chi Square for categorical variables, ANOVA for parametric references.
3. Results
3.1. Mortality, Morbidity and Demographics
The mortality rate in the NICU was reduced to almost half across the study period from 2016 to 2019 (Figure 2). Notably, despite an increase in the number of neonates admitted to the intensive care unit, a larger proportion being small for gestational age (SGA) and more neonates needing short respiratory support after birth. There is an improvement in the proportion of women receiving appropriate antenatal care and those offered with complete coverage of antenatal steroids. Other demographic characteristics did not differ significantly (Table 3).
Morbidity, as indicated by the proportion of neonates with culture-proven sepsis, as well as overall antibiotic utilisation rates in NICU, showed a statistically significant decline from 2016 to 2019 (Figure 3).
3.2. Nutrition
Daily consumption of MOM by the infants in the NICU increased significantly while the use of baby formula decreased (Figure 4). Sick and small neonates were prioritised to receive available PDHM if their MOM volume was insufficient.
The overall percentage change in weight of GA infants < 32 w from birth to two weeks decreased by mean (SD) 5.7 (7.0) in the initial phase of the project period and increased by mean (SD) 4.1 (5.2) in the late phase (Figure 5).
3.3. Additional Indicators of Care
DSC and “Structured observation sheets” were implemented for better observation, understanding of the needs and optimal handling of neonates according to their behaviour. As their daily routines, nurses also ensured control of external stimuli, clustering of nursing care activities, non-pharmacological pain management, and strengthening of parent involvement. Parents became active in the care of their hospitalised neonates. Improved understanding, along with a change in attitude towards KMC evolved. Other qualitative observations include improved resuscitation after focusing on standard operational procedures and teamwork in scenario training. Table 4 depicts quantitative data on KMC and nasal injury. Duration of skin-to-skin contact for individuals increased. A greater proportion of neonates, including those extremely premature and those on non-invasive respiratory support, received KMC. More caretakers, mothers, and others, engaged. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of nasal injuries due to non-invasive respiratory support, particularly the most severe (Table 4).
3.4. Implemented Routines
Routines for infection control were attended to in several ways. Focus on hand hygiene intensified and accomplished by adding new washing facilities at the entrances and making hand disinfectants more available. Immediate sorting of waste and laundry in appropriate bags in stands replaced heaps on the floor. Construction work was performed to hinder vermin in the wards. Protocols for routines and responsibility for regular cleaning of incubators, milk kitchen equipment, and more were framed and implemented.
According to the qualitative reports, better teamwork was obtained, as illustrated by the more consistent and accurate handover reports, dividing responsibility for the particular patients, and empowerment of colleagues through competence sharing and debriefing.
Efforts to maintain medical equipment were made by designating responsibilities to individual personnel to follow up routines for use, service, and repair (such as ensuring sufficient water in the cPAP-machine, choosing crucial alarms, organising service of ventilators).
3.5. The Comprehensive Lactation Management Centre (CLMC)
The CLMC offers individual assistance and helps all lactating women on a daily basis irrespective of whether their baby was admitted to the NICU or not. The most common challenges that interfere with the early initiation of breastfeeding include primiparous mothers, preterm born neonates admitted to the NICU, and engorgement of breasts.
The main goal was to provide MOM to all infants, using PDHM mainly as a bridge. The turnover in the milk bank was quite stable (Figure 6).
Contribution to “National guidelines and SOPs of Indian milk banks” was a ripple effect of developing the lactation centre, as SOPs developed locally to some extent served as references for drafting the national ones [10].
4. Discussion
The goal of the project “Oslo-Delhi: Improve newborn care” was to enhance the basic care of sick and premature neonates by narrowing the gap between the theory of optimal neonatal care and locally customised practise, and by establishing a lactation centre. Basic care is required for the wellbeing of all neonates, necessary for the survival of sick and premature neonates, and fundamental for all advanced medical treatment of neonates. A bundle of awareness, knowledge, skills, practical actions and efforts was implemented. The impact of the project is illustrated with various indicators. Due to the synergistic nature of the interventions, separate evaluation of the variables cannot be defined.
The mortality rate in the NICU decreased despite a larger and more vulnerable population. The proportion of SGA neonates and neonates suffering from early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) was higher. EONS is mainly caused by factors occurring before admittance to the NICU; hence, it is not controllable [11]. The share of neonates with late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) and culture-proven sepsis was reduced; however, and lower antibiotic utilisation rates resulted in reduced morbidity. The focus on infection prevention and augmenting the developing immune system (i.e., by providing human milk and limiting exposure to antibiotics), enhances this. Antimicrobial stewardship indicates better care as these drugs may also harm and, therefore, should be subjected to strict indications [12,13,14]. Decreased mortality and morbidity indicate better care, as do less cases of nasal injuries (for which nursing skills are crucial), more KMC, and better weight gain. The documented increase in nutrition with human milk is tantamount to better nutrition in this population [15]. In addition to increased growth, adequate nutrition is necessary for achieving optimal neurodevelopment [16] and greatly enhances the immune system [17,18]. Our results are in accordance with WHO: “child deaths can be prevented by providing immediate breastfeeding, improving access to skilled health professionals for antenatal, birth, and postnatal care, improving access to nutrition and micronutrients, promoting knowledge of dangers”.
Factors contributing to optimal care for neonates are described in the literature. The amount of information appears overwhelming, and it is challenging to prioritise and combine elements that are effective and feasible for a particular location. It may be more time consuming than what can be afforded to determine appropriate improvements. An external collaborating partner may observe the situation from a different angle and base considerations on alternate experiences, thus contributing to different solutions. Together, collaborators obtain a broader perspective of the present situation and a larger base of experience to separate futile and potentially significant measures to develop plans [19]. Returned exchanged personnel add to this as they have been exposed to different solutions, practised unfamiliar routines, and experienced results of these.
The exchange of health providers is beneficial for more reasons. Implementing changes in basic routines, especially those requiring more effort without necessarily immediately having a big impact, calls for patience, trust, and understanding amongst the staff which may require raised health literacy as well as altered attitude. It is recognised that not only knowledge and skills but also an attitude to own labour efforts and self-confidence are crucial [20,21]. Performing one’s professional skills in a different context and milieu often results in new perceptions of one’s own labour, which may influence attitude. Accordingly, personnel engaged in the project reported a positive attitude towards change and higher empowerment as a major change.
In addition to educational exchange, the project comprised development of a lactation centre. Nutrition is a ladder to higher levels of health support. The lactation centre facilitates many steps on this ladder. It serves as a source for developing and sharing knowledge and skills between colleagues and mothers. Furthermore, donated surplus milk serves a dual purpose. The receiving neonates avoid early exposure to formula and the donors keep up their production till their own neonates need more milk. Potential donors would otherwise not express milk, thereby staggering their production in a critical phase as well as increasing the risk of engorged breasts or discarding the milk because they lack access to a private freezer for storage. After MOM, PDHM is the second-best nutrition. Milk kitchens in the neonatal units are extended arms of the milk bank for safe defrosting and distribution of PDHM to the neonates. The development of a National guidelines and SOPs of Indian milk banks illustrates how a system and infrastructure alterations the results from individual efforts and attitudes.
Leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality, such as prematurity and infections, are largely preventable. India harbours health centres delivering top world-class perinatal care. The variation between locations causes unnecessary high national NMR. We believe that projects like the one described here, demonstrating improvements achieved by relatively limited economic resources, may be a step in the direction of the grander vision “Good health and wellbeing for all (SDG 3)”. Providing evidence for cost-effective measures may be a way for the global society to incentivize, urge, and support national efforts for extended sustainable overall improvement.
5. Conclusions
Care of hospitalised neonates was enhanced through educational exchange and facilitation for exploiting the potential of human milk. Mortality and morbidity were reduced. Reciprocal partnership, prioritising competence sharing, and comprehensive focus areas may effectively support “Better health for all”.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Unicef Neonatal Mortality Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/(accessed on 22 February 2021)
- 2Hug L. Alexander M. You D. Alkema L. National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based prokections to 2013: A systematic analysis Lancet 20197 e 710e 72010.1016/S 2214-109X(19)30163-9PMC 652751931097275 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3El-Atawi K. Elhalik M. Dash S. Quality improvement initiatives in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for improved care outcomes—A review of evidence J. Pediatr. Neonatal Care 2019911010.15406/jpnc.2019.09.00366 · doi ↗
- 4NOREC Improved Newborn Care Programme 2017–2022 Available online: https://www.norec.no/prosjekter/improved-newborn-care-programme-2017-2020/(accessed on 8 January 2025)
- 5Ogrinc G. Davies L. Goodman D. Batalden P. Davidoff F. Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Q Uality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process BMJ Qual. Saf.20162598699210.1136/bmjqs-2015-00441126369893 PMC 5256233 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6NOREC Collaboration Agreement Application Templates Available online: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=c 45ee 220adb 943bb Jmltd HM 9M Tcy ND Ex Mj Aw MC Zp Z 3Vp ZD 0z NT Yx M 2Vk NS 1i ZD Ez LT Yw MG Ut M 2Yy OS 0y YTM 0Ym Nl Nj Yx Mm Ima W 5za WQ 9NTM 5NA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=35613 ed 5-bd 13-600e-3f 29-2a 34bce 6612 b&psq=NOREC+template&u=a 1a HR 0c HM 6Ly 93d 3cubm 9y ZW Mubm 8v ZW 4vbm V 3cy 9ncm Fud C 1y ZW Npc Gllbn Rz L 3Vw ZGF 0ZW Qt Y 29sb G Fib 3Jhd Glvbi 1h Z 3Jl ZW 1lbn Qt YX Bwb Glj YX Rpb 24td G Vtc Gxhd G Vz Lw&ntb=1(accessed on 8 January 2025)
- 7Haaland K. Sitaraman S. Increased breastfeeding; an educational exchange program between India and Norway improving newborn health in a low- and middle-income hospital population J. Health Popul. Nutr.2022411610.1186/s 41043-022-00297-835505386 PMC 9066889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Nangia S. Indo Norwegian CME on Advances in Noenatology Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ah UK Ewimzf H Iz 86I Ax W 7PRAIHZ 9WE 6s Q Fno EC Bw QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nnfi.org%2Fassests%2Fupload%2Fupcoming-pdf%2F Scientific_Programme-_Final_20_2_2020_Final_(1).pdf&usg=A Ov Vaw 0C Ko KL 6w Zvezoi G 6k DKE Ne&opi=89978449(accessed on 8 January 2025)
