# Optimization of Intra-Arterial Administration of Chemotherapeutic Agents for Glioblastoma in the F98-Fischer Glioma-Bearing Rat Model

**Authors:** Juliette Latulippe, Laurent-Olivier Roy, Fernand Gobeil, David Fortin

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/biom15030421 · Biomolecules · 2025-03-16

## TL;DR

Researchers tested different chemotherapy drugs given directly into the artery to treat brain cancer in rats, finding two drugs that significantly improved survival.

## Contribution

The study evaluates novel chemotherapy formulations for intra-arterial administration in a rat glioma model, identifying promising candidates for clinical translation.

## Key findings

- Topotecan administered intra-arterially increased survival compared to intravenous administration.
- A new formulation of carboplatin significantly improved survival compared to conventional forms.
- Paclitaxel was too neurotoxic for intra-arterial use.

## Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a difficult disease to treat for different reasons, with the blood–brain barrier (BBB) preventing therapeutic drugs from reaching the tumor being one major hurdle. The median overall survival is only 14.6 months after the standard first line of treatment. At relapse, there is no recognized standard second-line treatment. Our team uses intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy as a means to bypass the BBB, hence achieving an overall median survival of 25 months. However, most patients eventually fail the treatment and progress. This is why we wish to expand our portfolio of options in terms of chemotherapy agents available for IA administration. In this study, we tested topotecan, cytarabine, and new formulations of carboplatin and paclitaxel by IA administration in the F98-Fischer glioma-bearing rat model as a screening tool for identifying potential candidate drugs. The topotecan IA group showed increased survival compared to the intravenous (IV) group (29.0 vs. 23.5), whereas the IV cytarabine group survived longer than the IA group (26.5 vs. 22.5). The new formulation of carboplatin showed a significant increase in survival compared to two previous studies with the conventional form (37.5 vs. 26.0 and 30.0). As for paclitaxel, it was too neurotoxic for IA administration. Topotecan and the new formulation of carboplatin demonstrated significant results, warranting their transition for consideration in clinical trials.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** topotecan (PubChem CID 60700), cytarabine (PubChem CID 6253), carboplatin (PubChem CID 426756), paclitaxel (PubChem CID 36314)
- **Diseases:** Glioblastoma (MONDO:0018177), GBM (MONDO:0018177)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Glioma (MESH:D005910), GBM (MESH:D005909), neurotoxic (MESH:D020258), tumor (MESH:D009369)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116]
- **Cell lines:** F98 — Rattus norvegicus (Rat), Rat malignant glioma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_3510)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11940523/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11940523/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11940523/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11940523