# Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: an 8-week pilot dose-escalation study

**Authors:** Pramot Lappichetpaiboon, Somsak Tiamkao, Supanigar Ruangsri, Jarin Paphangkorakit, Waranuch Pitiphat, Teekayu P. Jorns

PMC · DOI: 10.22514/jofph.2025.011 · 2025-03-12

## TL;DR

This study explores lacosamide as a treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, finding it effective and safe with mild side effects.

## Contribution

The study introduces lacosamide as a potential alternative to carbamazepine for trigeminal neuralgia.

## Key findings

- Lacosamide reduced pain scores in trigeminal neuralgia patients at 2 weeks.
- No significant difference in pain reduction was found between lacosamide and carbamazepine at 4 weeks.
- Adverse effects of lacosamide were mild and included somnolence and vertigo.

## Abstract

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe neuropathic pain condition in the 
orofacial region, with carbamazepine recommended as the first-line treatment. 
Nonetheless, its application is constrained by unfavorable drug responses and 
side effects. The objective of this research was to assess the effectiveness and 
safety of lacosamide, a third-generation anticonvulsant, in individuals with TN, 
and to juxtapose the findings with observational records from recently diagnosed 
TN patients who underwent carbamazepine monotherapy within the corresponding 
timeframe. Methods: An 8-week flexible dose titration of lacosamide was performed on newly 
diagnosed 12 TN patients who were divided into two groups: 200 mg/day (n = 5), 
and 400 mg/day (n = 7). Outcome measures included average pain score, Brief Pain 
Inventory-facial scores, and side effects. Patients were followed-up at 2, 4 and 
8 weeks after baseline. Results: The percentage change of pain score at 4-week visit was 
compared between both lacosamide groups and patients receiving carbamazepine 
(n = 6) for four weeks during concurrent period. Both 
lacosamide groups experienced a decrease in pain score at 2-week follow-up, and 
differences in average pain score reduction were not observed between the two 
groups across all visits (p > 0.05). The mean Brief Pain 
Inventory-facial score in the lacosamide 200 mg/day group was higher than that in 
the 400 mg/day group at the 2-week follow-up (p = 0.03). Interestingly, 
the 4-week follow-up revealed that there were no significant variances in pain 
intensity between the lacosamide and the contemporaneous carbamazepine cohorts 
(p > 0.05). Frequently noted adverse events were mild somnolence (n = 
9), slight vertigo (n = 5), and emotional lability (n = 2) without instances of 
severe adverse drug responses. Conclusions: Lacosamide demonstrates potential as a 
therapeutic option for patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia. Clinical Trial Registration: TCTR20210811002.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lacosamide (PubChem CID 219078), carbamazepine (PubChem CID 2554)
- **Diseases:** trigeminal neuralgia (MONDO:0008599)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** vertigo (MESH:D014717), Pain (MESH:D010146), TN (MESH:D014277), neuropathic pain (MESH:D009437), somnolence (MESH:D006970)
- **Chemicals:** carbamazepine (MESH:D002220), Lacosamide (MESH:D000078334)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11934738/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11934738