Qualitative research in cardiac surgery: importance, challenges, and opportunities

TL;DR

This paper discusses the underuse of qualitative research in cardiac surgery and suggests ways to better integrate it for improved patient care.

Contribution

The paper proposes strategic areas for future qualitative research in cardiac surgery and advocates for mixed-methods approaches.

Findings

Qualitative research reveals patient autonomy and post-operative challenges in valve replacement procedures.

Financial burdens are a significant concern for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Mixed-methods research can comprehensively address complex healthcare issues in cardiac surgery.

Abstract

Qualitative research in cardiac surgery remains underutilised despite its crucial role in understanding patient experiences and improving care delivery. Cardiac surgery has traditionally been dominated by quantitative research and despite its clear value, qualitative research remains underutilised in cardiac surgery. This narrative review highlights key qualitative findings in valve replacement procedures, including patient autonomy in decision-making, post-operative challenges, and financial burdens. Mixed-methods research combining quantitative and qualitative approaches offers a comprehensive framework for addressing complex healthcare challenges. We propose strategic areas for future qualitative research and recommend increased integration of qualitative methodologies in cardiac surgical practice.