Age and outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes admitted to hospital with COVID‐19: A cohort study
M. Ni'Man, Y. Ruan, J. Davies, S. Harris, D. Nagi, P. Narendran, B. C. T. Field, I. Idris, D. Patel, R. Rea, R. E. J. Ryder, S. H. Wild, K. A. Várnai, E. G. Wilmot, K. Khunti

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Clinical features | Age at hospital admission |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| <50 years ( | ≥50 years ( | ||
| Sex M/total (%) | 166/279 (59%) | 2139/3475 (62%) | 0.23 |
| Mean Age years (SD) | 43.3 (6.4) | 74 (11) | <0.01 |
| Ethnicity | White 79/279 (28%) | White 2063/3476 (59%) | <0.01 |
| Asian 81/279 (29%) | Asian 497/3476 (14%) | <0.01 | |
| Black 35/279 (13%) | Black 270/3476 (8%) | <0.01 | |
| Other 28/279 (10%) | Other 88/3476 (3%) | <0.01 | |
| Unknown 56/279 (20%) | Unknown 558/3476 (16%) | NA | |
| Admission features | |||
| DKA on admission | 17/279 (6%) | 107/3476 (3%) | <0.01 |
| Mean and median (IQR) admission blood glucose (mmol/l) | 12.5 (7.4) | 11.0 (6.8) | <0.01 |
| 10.6 [7.4,15.3] | 9.0 [6.7,13.0] | <0.01 | |
| Mean and median (IQR) Creatinine(mcmol/l) | 125 (166) | 151 (152) | <0.01 |
| 74 [59, 103] | 104 [77, 160] | <0.01 | |
| Pre‐COVID characteristics | |||
| Smoker | 26/129 (20%) | 734/1698 (43%) | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 33.7 (9.5) | 29.1 (7.2) | <0.01 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 67 (26) | 61 (21) | <0.01 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.3 (2.4) | 7.7 (1.9) | <0.01 |
| Microvascular disease (diabetic nephropathy, foot ulcer, retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy) | 54/260 (21%) | 1396/3174 (44%) | <0.01 |
| Macrovascular disease (peripheral vascular disease, ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease) | 33/271 (12%) | 1470/3342 (44%) | <0.01 |
| Co‐morbidities | |||
| Hypertension | 120/252 (48%) | 2395/3256 (74%) | <0.01 |
| Dementia | 2/223 (1%) | 489/2855 (17%) | <0.01 |
| Asthma | 50/230 (22%) | 385/2899 (13%) | <0.01 |
| COPD | 4/216 (2%) | 468/2769 (17%) | <0.01 |
| Malignant neoplasm | 7/234 (3%) | 513/2988 (17%) | <0.01 |
| Treatment on admission | |||
| Metformin | 144/244 (59%) | 1506/3087 (49%) | <0.01 |
| Sulfonylurea | 47/238 (20%) | 599/3031 (20%) | 0.12 |
| DPP‐4 | 44/241 (18%) | 726/3024 (24%) | <0.01 |
| GLP‐1 | 15/238 (6%) | 93/3000 (3%) | <0.01 |
| SGLT‐2 | 21/228 (9%) | 209/2839 (7%) | <0.01 |
| Insulin | 86/229 (38%) | 1026/2882 (36%) | 0.13 |
| Outcomes | |||
| Death | 34/278 (12%) | 1233/3443 (36%) | <0.01 |
- —Diabetes UK 10.13039/501100000361
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Diabetes Management and Research · Diabetes and associated disorders
INTRODUCTION
1
Type 2 diabetes has been associated with an increased risk of COVID‐19 severity and mortality.1 The incidence of young onset (aged <50 years) T2D (YOT2D) has increased in many countries over the past 30 years, particularly in ethnic minority groups.2 Accumulating evidence confirms that individuals with YOT2D have greater risks of developing micro‐ and macrovascular complication.2 The reasons for poorer outcomes in YOT2D are not known but associated risk factors include female sex, obesity, low birthweight, family history of T2D and non‐white ethnicity.2 In view of the high‐risk phenotype, YOT2D may have worse outcomes following COVID‐19.
The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess outcomes, by age on admission to hospital, in two cohorts with T2D: young (<50 years) and older (≥50 years).
METHODS
2
Data for this retrospective cohort study were collected through a nationwide audit between March and December 2020, conducted by the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD), of COVID‐19‐related admissions in people with diabetes. Full details of data collection have been published previously.3
Whilst there is variance in the definition of YOT2D between studies,4 we opted to define the age range of the younger people with type 2 diabetes as <50 years, opposed to the typical <40 years definition for YOT2D. This enabled us to study a larger cohort, whilst still referencing this <40 years cohort.
Continuous data variables were summarised as mean (standard deviation) or median [interquartile range] for normally and non‐normally distributed data, respectively. We compared the characteristics of patients using t‐tests or chi‐squared tests for continuous or categorical data. All statistical analysis was performed using R, version 3.3. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
3
Data from 279 YOT2D were compared to data from 3476 individuals aged ≥50 years with Type 2 diabetes on admission (see Table 1). Despite the mean age of 43.3 years in the YOT2D cohort, there was a high prevalence of microvascular (21%) and macrovascular disease (12%) and hypertension (48%). On admission to hospital, the YOT2D had higher median [IQR] blood glucose levels (10.6[7.4,15.3] mmol/l, p < 0.01) compared to the population with T2D that was older (≥50 years) on admission (9.0[6.7,13.0] mmol/L, p < 0.01) and higher mean (SD) BMI (33.7 (9.5) kg/m^2^ vs. 29.1(7.2) kg/m^2^, p < 0.01). Larger proportions of YOT2D were on metformin (59% vs. 49%, p < 0.01), SGLT2 inhibitors (9% vs. 6%, p < 0.01), GLP‐1 receptor agonists (6% vs. 3%, p < 0.01) and they had higher HbA1c levels (67 (8.3%) versus 61 (7.7%) mmol/mol, p < 0.01). Similar proportions of both groups were treated with insulin (38% vs. 36%, p < 0.12). Overall, 6% of the younger cohort presented with diabetic ketoacidosis, double that observed in the older group (3%, p < 0.01). Mortality during admission for YOT2D was 12% compared to 36% in the older group (p < 0.01).
TABLE 1: Clinical outcomes for people with T2D <50 years versus ≥50 years at hospital admission with COVID‐19.
DISCUSSION
4
Our data show that despite their young age, YOT2D admitted to hospital with COVID‐19 had a high prevalence of adverse cardio‐metabolic risk factors and diabetes complications, double the prevalence of DKA on admission compared with the older cohort and high mortality given their age. These data support the view that YOT2D represent an extreme phenotype with multiple cardiovascular risk factors leading to the premature development of micro and macrovascular complications. YOT2D are disproportionately from lower socioeconomic backgrounds,2 a further independent risk factor for adverse outcomes related to COVID‐19.5 The underlying pathogenic factors of YOT2D such as insulin resistance and obesity also play a role in the observed adverse cardio‐metabolic risk profile.
We were not able to determine whether the inflammatory sequelae of COVID‐19 worsen glycaemic control and/or whether the immunosuppressive effects of contribute to the risk of severe COVID‐19 complications. Irrespective of the underlying cause, the mortality in YOT2D observed here was around 30 times higher than that observed from the primary care data analysis in England which reported an annualised mortality rate in people aged under 50 with diabetes of 0.38% in 2019.6 Whilst Barron et al. (2020) looked specifically at in‐hospital deaths, our data looked at people with type 2 diabetes that were admitted to hospital with COVID‐19; of which mortality was one outcome. This meant that although our data is not as well powered as Barron et al. (2020), it benefits from being multi‐centred and having a focus on those admitted with both COVID‐19 and type 2 diabetes.
Further limitations of the study include lack of information on the duration of diabetes and our inability to exclude an incorrect classification of type of diabetes among the study population.
CONCLUSION
5
YOT2D admitted to hospital with COVID‐19 represent a high‐risk cohort with multiple co‐morbidities. Overall, 6% of YOT2D with COVID‐19 had DKA on admission to hospital and despite younger age, there was a 12% in‐hospital mortality in this UK cohort. These findings add further evidence of the importance of primary and secondary prevention of type 2 diabetes.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
KK has acted as a consultant, speaker or received grants for investigator‐initiated studies for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis, Servier, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Applied Therapeutics, Embecta and Nestle Health Science. KK was chair of the ethnicity subgroup of the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and is a member of SAGE. KK is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands (ARC EM) and the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). EGW has received personal fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Insulet, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Sinocare, Ypsomed and research support from Abbott, Embecta, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. DP advisory work: Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelgeim, Eli Lilly, Sanofi. Educational Work, Eli Lilly, NovoNordisk. MN, YR, JD, SH, DN, PN, BCTF, II, RR, REJR, SHW, KAV no CoI.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Barron E , Bakhai C , Kar P , et al. Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID‐19‐related mortality in England: a whole‐population study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(10):813‐822.32798472 10.1016/S 2213-8587(20)30272-2PMC 7426088 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Magliano DJ , Sacre JW , Harding JL , Gregg EW , Zimmet PZ , Shaw JE . Young‐onset type 2 diabetes mellitus—implications for morbidity and mortality. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(6):321‐331.32203408 10.1038/s 41574-020-0334-z · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Nagi D , Ryder RE , Ruan Y , et al. An audit of people admitted to hospital with diabetes and coronavirus (SARS‐Co V‐2): data collection methods. The Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) Nationwide audit. Br J Diabetes. 2021;21(1):96‐99.
- 4Barron E , Sharp SJ , Khunti K , Bakhai C , Wareham NJ , Valabhji J . Prediabetes, participation in the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme, and associations with COVID‐19‐related mortality: a whole population study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024;1(212):111692.10.1016/j.diabres.2024.11169238723673 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Albani V , Welsh CE , Brown H , Matthews FE , Bambra C . Explaining the deprivation gap in COVID‐19 mortality rates: a decomposition analysis of geographical inequalities in England. Soc Sci Med. 2022;311:115319.36088725 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115319 PMC 9441468 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Heald A , Stedman M , Robinson A , et al. Mortality rate associated with diabetes: outcomes from a general practice level analysis in England using the Royal College of general practitioners (RCGP) database indicate stability over a 15 year period. Diabetes Ther. 2022;13(3):505‐516.35187627 10.1007/s 13300-022-01215-1PMC 8934837 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
