This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTION: Effect of Two Different Surgical Modalities for Pelvic Organ Prolapse on Postoperative Wound Infection in Patients: A Meta‐Analysis

TL;DR
A retracted study on surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse and wound infections is withdrawn due to a flawed peer review process.
Contribution
The paper is retracted, revealing issues with the peer review process rather than presenting new findings.
Findings
The article was retracted due to a compromised peer review process.
The authors did not respond to the retraction notice.
Abstract
RETRACTION: CuiH. , LangX. , HuangC. , and SunJ. , “Effect of Two Different Surgical Modalities for Pelvic Organ Prolapse on Postoperative Wound Infection in Patients: A Meta‐Analysis,” International Wound Journal 21, no. 3 (2024): e14802, 10.1111/iwj.14802.38472131 PMC10932775 The above article, published online on 12 March 2024, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPelvic floor disorders treatments · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
