[Corrigendum] Upregulation of interleukin‑17F in colorectal cancer promotes tumor invasion by inducing epithelial‑mesenchymal transition
Yusheng Chen, Zhou Yang, Dejun Wu, Zhijun Min, Yingjun Quan
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions · Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis · Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
Oncol Rep 42: 1141–1148, 2019; DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7220
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' and the Editor's attention that the clone image featured in Fig. 4A for the ‘NC’ (or ‘negative control’) data panel on p. 1146 had also been featured as the ‘NC’ experimental data panel in Fig. 4A of another article entitled ‘Interleukin 1β/1RA axis in colorectal cancer regulates tumor invasion, proliferation and apoptosis via autophagy’ (DOI: 10.3892/or.2020.7475), which was published by the same research group in the same journal.
In this pair of articles, the authors were researching IL-17F and IL-1B/1RA, respectively; all experiments were performed on interleukins using the same batch of cells, and it was the authors’ intention to have included these data, as they were portrayed, in both articles. However, to avoid any possible confusion, the authors now present alternative data for the ‘NC’ experiment in Fig. 4A for the above article, and the revised figure is shown on the next page.
In addition, the authors have realized that the data panel in Fig. 1C on p. 1144, which was intended to represent the ‘Tumor’ immunohistochemical experiment (right-hand panel), was inadvertently chosen incorrectly. The correct data for this panel is shown in the revised version of Fig. 1 opposite. Note that this error did not affect either the results or the conclusions reported in this paper. The authors are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum, and they apologize to the Editor and to the readership for any inconvenience caused.