Correction: Analyzing the charge contributions of metal–organic framework derived nanosized cobalt nitride/carbon composites in asymmetrical supercapacitors
Vishal Shrivastav‡, Mansi‡, Prashant Dubey, Umesh K. Tiwari, Akash Deep, Wojciech Nogala, Shashank Sundriyal
TL;DR
This correction addresses an error in a study about cobalt nitride/carbon composites used in supercapacitors.
Contribution
The paper provides a correction to previously published findings on the charge contributions of a specific material in supercapacitors.
Findings
An error in the original study's analysis of charge contributions was identified.
The correction ensures accurate interpretation of the material's performance in asymmetrical supercapacitors.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Analyzing the charge contributions of metal–organic framework derived nanosized cobalt nitride/carbon composites in asymmetrical supercapacitors’ by Vishal Shrivastav et al., Nanoscale Adv., 2024, 6, 4219–4229, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NA00291A.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions10.13039/100010665
- —Horizon 2020 Framework Programme10.13039/100010661
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
The authors regret the omission of The Ministry of Education and Science, as an Acknowledgement for this research.
The corrected first sentence of the Acknowledgements is:
“Vishal Shrivastav wants to acknowledge the support from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 847639 and from the Ministry of Education and Science.”
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.