# Systematic screening of infection prevention policies for equity impacts

**Authors:** Caitlin L. McGrath, Yasaman Fatemi, Thérèse Mirisola, Tanya Ferreira, Adrienne D’Alo, Victoria J.L. Konold, Alicia Tieder, Ashley Stratton, Matthew P. Kronman, Danielle M. Zerr

PMC · DOI: 10.1017/ash.2025.16 · Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology : ASHE · 2025-03-14

## TL;DR

This paper examines how infection prevention policies may affect marginalized groups and highlights the need for equity considerations in policy design.

## Contribution

The study introduces a systematic approach to assess infection prevention policies for their potential equity impacts.

## Key findings

- 31% of policies could significantly impact marginalized groups.
- Most policies lacked existing equity considerations.
- Systematic review can lead to improved care and quality.

## Abstract

We reviewed infection prevention policies using an adapted Equity Impact Assessment tool. Thirty-one percent of policies had substantial potential to impact marginalized groups and create or sustain inequities, and most lacked existing equity considerations. Systematic policy review for equity implications can result in actions to improve care and quality.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11920908/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11920908/full.md

## References

8 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11920908/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11920908