# Postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive total versus supracervical hysterectomy for endometriosis: a NSQIP study

## TL;DR

This study found that supracervical hysterectomy leads to fewer short-term complications than total hysterectomy for endometriosis patients.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence comparing complication rates between two minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches for endometriosis.

## Key findings

- Supracervical hysterectomy (LSCH) had a 3.7% complication rate versus 8.5% for total hysterectomy (TLH).
- LSCH showed significantly lower odds of both major and minor complications compared to TLH.
- Multivariable analysis confirmed LSCH's reduced risk of complications.

## Abstract

To study the rate and odds of 30 day postoperative complications among patients undergoing minimally invasive total (TLH) compared to supracervical (LSCH) hysterectomy for endometriosis.

A cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis undergoing hysterectomy. We used prospectively collected data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. We compared short-term (30 day) complications, following minimally invasive TLH and LSCH for endometriosis. The primary outcome was the risk of any postoperative complications according to the surgical approach.

A total of 5,278 patients were included, 4,952 (93.8%) underwent TLH and 326 (6.2%) underwent LSCH. The incidence of any complication was significantly lower in the LSCH group compared to the TLH group (3.7% vs. 8.5%, p = .001). Both major complications (1.5% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.043) and minor complications (2.8% vs. 5.4%, p = .039) were less frequent in the LSCH group compared to the TLH group.

In multivariable regression analysis, patients undergoing LSCH had significantly lower odds of any complication [aOR 95%CI 0.40 (0.22–0.72)], and of minor complications [aOR 95%CI 0.47 (0.24–0.92)] compared to TLH.

LSCH is associated with a lower odd of short-term postoperative complications compared to TLH for patients with endometriosis.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-024-07749-y.