# Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy – an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice

**Authors:** Ian J. B. Stephens, Emily Kelly, Fernando Ferreira, Marja A. Boermeester, Michael E. Sugrue

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02804-y · European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery · 2025-03-18

## TL;DR

This study finds that modern techniques to reduce abdominal hernias after emergency surgery are not widely adopted by surgeons globally.

## Contribution

The paper provides the first international survey on the use of modern abdominal closure techniques in emergency laparotomy.

## Key findings

- Only 42.2% of surgeons used 5 mm wide tissue bites placed every 5 mm during closure.
- Just 10% of surgeons used prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) in emergency laparotomy.
- Suture-to-wound ratio was rarely measured, with only 7.7% of surgeons tracking it.

## Abstract

Incisional hernias (IH) occur after 20–30% of laparotomies. Modern closure techniques including small bite closure and prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) demonstrate significant reduction in IH rates. European and American Hernia Society guidelines suggest use of small bite closure and consideration of PMA at elective laparotomy closure but do not make a recommendation for emergency surgery. International surveys demonstrate poor uptake of small bite closure and PMA. This survey aims to assess the uptake of these techniques specifically in emergency abdominal surgery.

An online, cross-sectional survey was circulated through emergency general surgery (EGS) and abdominal closure networks between June and August 2024. This interrogated surgeons’ technical approach to all elements of emergency laparotomy closure including use of wound bundles, small bite, suture-to-wound ratio, suture choice, and PMA.

The survey was completed by 234 general surgeons from 32 countries. Wound bundle components varied between surgeons. Small bite closure was used by 85.8% during midline laparotomy closure but only 42.2% of surgeons used 5 mm wide tissue bites placed every 5 mm. Suture-to-wound ratio was rarely measured (7.7%). A looped PDS (size 0 or 1) was used preferentially (42.7%). Self-locking (15.8%) and antiseptic coated sutures (20.2%) were used infrequently. One in ten surgeons used PMA and most often placed the mesh in the retrorectus space (39.6%).

Uptake of new techniques in emergency laparotomy has been variable and with limited penetrance amongst emergency general surgeons. Many surgeons are using adapted versions of the original descriptions of these approaches.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-025-02804-y.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Hernia (MESH:D006547), PDS (MESH:C536648), IH (MESH:D000069290)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11919986/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11919986/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11919986/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11919986