# Corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence during evidence accumulation in sensorimotor decision‐making

## TL;DR

This study uses brain and muscle signals to track how people make decisions based on visual motion cues.

## Contribution

The study introduces corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence as continuous measures of sensorimotor decision-making.

## Key findings

- Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and intermuscular coherence (IMC) show distinct patterns during evidence accumulation.
- CMC coherence levels depend on stimulus strength, while IMC shows a weaker relationship.
- CMC coherence stabilizes before movement, suggesting a decision bound independent of stimulus strength.

## Abstract

Evidence accumulation processes during decision‐making are thought to continuously feed into the motor system, preparing multiple competing motor plans, of which one is executed when the evidence is complete. Previously, the state of this accumulation process has been studied by reading out the preparatory state of the motor system with evoked responses, once per trial. In this study, we aim to continuously track the sensorimotor decision during the trial using corticomuscular (CMC) and intermuscular coherence (IMC). We recorded EEG and EMG of healthy young adults (n = 34) who viewed random dot motion stimuli, with varying strengths across trials, and indicated their perceived motion direction by reaching towards one of two targets, requiring either flexion or extension of the elbow. Coherence was computed in the beta band. After stimulus presentation, both CMC and IMC show an initial phasic pattern, which is followed by sustained coherence patterns at a level that depends on stimulus strength for CMC. Prior to reach onset, the CMC for different stimulus strengths had a tendency to settle at similar levels. This tendency tentatively marks a stimulus‐independent decision bound. We conclude that CMC, and to a lesser extent IMC, track the evidence accumulation process on a single trial.