Efficacy of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CBCT Images of Teeth With Ceramic Brackets With/Without Coated Archwires: An In Vitro Study
Parisa Soltani, Mariangela Cernera, Marzie Kachuie, Amirhossein Moaddabi, Mehran Khoramian, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Niccolò Giuseppe Armogida, Carlo Rengo

TL;DR
This study tested a metal artifact reduction algorithm on CBCT scans of teeth with ceramic brackets and found it did not significantly improve image quality.
Contribution
The study evaluates the effectiveness of a MAR algorithm in reducing artifacts in CBCT images of teeth with ceramic brackets and coated archwires.
Findings
The MAR algorithm did not significantly improve contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in CBCT scans with or without archwires.
CNR increased significantly at greater distances from the tooth center, regardless of the MAR algorithm's use.
Tooth type and distance from the tooth center had a significant impact on CNR values.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm for cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of teeth with ceramic brackets with/without coated archwires. In this in vitro study, 10 ceramic brackets were bonded to maxillary anterior teeth from the second premolar of one side to the second premolar of the other side on a dry human skull. CBCT scans (85 kVp, 8 mA, 14.5 s) were taken twice in the presence and absence of coated nickel–titanium (NiTi) archwires. The skull was placed in a water container for soft tissue simulation during scanning. The images were reconstructed with and without the MAR algorithm, and imported to ImageJ software in DICOM format to calculate the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) at 15‐, 20‐, and 25‐mm distances from the tooth center. Data were analyzed by independent t‐test, ANOVA, and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05). Application…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDental Radiography and Imaging · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Radiation Dose and Imaging
