# Thai version of ACL return to sports after injury scale translated with cross-cultural adaptation provided the good validation in Thai patients who received ACL reconstruction

## TL;DR

The Thai version of the ACL Return to Sports after Injury scale was validated for use in athletes recovering from ACL surgery, showing good reliability and consistency.

## Contribution

The Thai ACL-RSI was cross-culturally adapted and validated for psychological readiness assessment in ACL reconstruction patients.

## Key findings

- The Thai ACL-RSI showed high content validity (IOC 0.91) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.84).
- It had significant negative correlation with the Thai TSK (r = −0.67, p < 0.001), indicating good construct validity.
- The instrument is reliable and suitable for assessing psychological readiness to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

## Abstract

Purpose: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sports after Injury scale (ACL-RSI) has been translated and culturally adapted into the Thai version. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Thai ACL-RSI for athletes recovering from ACL reconstruction. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study. Forward-backward translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Thai ACL-RSI were performed and tested in 40 athletes (8 females, 32 males; mean age 30.2 ± 7.32 years; mean body weight 70.7 ± 13.36 kg; mean height 170.1 ± 6.53 cm; mean body mass index 24.5 ± 3.74 kg/m2; mean time from surgery to evaluation 8.43 ± 1.83 months). Participants completed the translated Thai ACL-RSI and the validated Thai Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). The Thai ACL-RSI underwent content validity, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity assessment. Results: The Thai ACL-RSI demonstrated commendable content validity (item-objective congruence index [IOC] 0.91), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient 0.84), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.75). There was a significant negative correlation with TSK (r = −0.67, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Thai ACL-RSI is validated, reliable, and consistent with the Thai TSK. This instrument can potentially measure psychological factors influencing preparedness for sports participation after ACL reconstruction. The evaluation of return-to-sport readiness should involve a multidisciplinary approach, including surgeons, physiotherapists, and psychologists, to ensure a comprehensive assessment of physical, functional, and psychological factors.