Erratum for “The relationship between radiographic disc calcification score and FGF4L2 genotype in dachshunds”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFibroblast Growth Factor Research · Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology · Veterinary Oncology Research
Stacey Sullivan , David Redden , Froydis Hardeng , Malin Sundqvist , Michelle Kutzler
J Vet Intern Med. 2025; 39(1). 10.1111/jvim.17281.PMC1166596039715441
In the article cited above, in the Results section of the Abstract the second sentence erroneously states, “1 or 2 FGF4L2 copies.” This should state “0 or 1 FGF4L2 copies.” This concept is correctly stated in the main body of the article.