# Surgeons consider Rockwood classification the most important factor for decision‐making in acute, high‐grade acromioclavicular dislocations

**Authors:** Eduard Van Eecke, Arno Alexander Macken, Derek van Deurzen, Thibault Lafosse, Antoon van Raebroeckx, Geert Alexander Buijze, Michel van den Bekerom, Patrik Noll, Patrik Noll, Jorge Villa Sanches, Ken Lee Puah, Stefan Stanciugelu, Jeremy Munji, Etienne Lejeune, Kalman Piper, Claudio Rosso, Steven Corbett, Daniel Rojas, James Romanowski, Nyiko Chauke, Sophie Grosclaude, Youri Reiland, Michael Kimmeyer, Daniel Schwartz, Javiern Martin, Michael Thomas Freehill, Philippe Debeer, Saartje Defoort, Gaetan Opsomer, Ghislain Geurts, Stijn Hermans, Leon Diederix, Olivier Flamand, Antonio Harcha, François Melebeck, Alexander van Tongel, David Bassens, Florence Mulpas, Justine Barbier Michiel van Parys, Hans van der Bracht, Pieter‐Bastiaan De Keyzer, Dirk Petré, Wouter Jak, Rick Houben, Filip Robijns, Delphine Lambrecht, Luigi Banez, Lorenzo Castellani, Richard Jany, Vincent Wlodek, Alfonso Barnechea, Jennifer Mutch, Dhrumil Patel, Jose C. Minarro, Boukoros Evangelos, Christian Owesen, Ali Maqdes, C. P. J. Visser, Dominique Misselyn, Egbert J. D. Veen, Tim Kraal

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70203 · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025-03-13

## TL;DR

Surgeons primarily use the Rockwood classification to decide on surgery for severe shoulder dislocations, often preferring surgery over non-surgery.

## Contribution

This study identifies Rockwood classification as the most influential factor in surgeons' treatment decisions for high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations.

## Key findings

- 76% of surgeons preferred surgery for acute, high-grade AC joint dislocations.
- Rockwood classification was the most important factor for 69% of surgeons.
- Findings contrast with recent studies showing good outcomes for non-surgical treatment.

## Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of patient‐specific factors, including age, lifestyle considerations as well as the extent of injury according to the Rockwood classification (RW), on the surgeon's decision‐making in the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for acute, high‐grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons were requested to complete an online questionnaire consisting of closed and open questions regarding the treatment of acute, high‐grade AC joint dislocations and 24 fictive clinical scenarios.

A total of 133 answered questionnaires were collected. 27 different nationalities from five continents were represented. The included participants had a median experience of 12 years (interquartile range: 2–41). Overall, the treatment option for surgery (answer: YES) was chosen in 2426 answers (76% of cases) compared to ‘NO’ in 766 (24% of cases). RW classification was considered the most important factor influencing surgical decision‐making for most surgeons (69%). Two thirds of the participants answered that smoking does not impact their decision towards surgery and as to the influence of body mass index (BMI) on decision‐making, half of the respondents would not alter their preferred treatment based on BMI. Finally, there were no significant differences in decision‐making regarding the influence of the participant's demographics.

This study highlights that RW classification is the most important factor to consider in the surgeon's decision‐making between operative and nonoperative treatment in acute, high‐grade AC joint dislocations. Participants preferred operative treatment over nonoperative treatment in acute, high‐grade AC joint dislocation in 76% of case scenarios, increasing up to 90% when RW Grade III lesions were not taken into account. These findings contrast with recent studies reporting good functional outcomes of conservatively treated acute, high‐grade AC injuries and highlight the need to bridge the gap between evidence and practice.

Level V.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AC injuries (MESH:D014947), AC joint dislocation (MESH:D004204)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904811/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904811/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904811