# Effect of conventional physiotherapy versus strain counter for trapezitis patients

**Authors:** Alok Desai, Anandh S., Dhirajkumar Mane

PMC · DOI: 10.6026/9732063002001410 · Bioinformation · 2024-10-31

## TL;DR

This study compares conventional physiotherapy with a strain-counter technique for treating trapezitis, finding the latter more effective.

## Contribution

The study introduces strain-counterstain as a low-cost, effective treatment for trapezitis.

## Key findings

- Group 2 showed significant improvements in range of motion.
- Group 2 had better pain and neck disability outcome scores.
- SCS is a low-cost and effective treatment for trapezitis.

## Abstract

On average 38.7% of the adult population experiences neck pain due to trapezitis. Therefore, it is of interest to determine the
efficacy of strain-counterstain (SCS) technique in a treatment of trapezitis. 40 participants were randomly allocated to two groups,
where group 1 received conventional physiotherapy treatment, while group 2 received the experimental SCS treatment program with 20
patients each. We found that, group 2 showed significant improvements in range of motion, pain and neck disability outcome scores. Thus,
that SCS can be used as a low-cost and effective treatment for trapezitis.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** neck pain (MESH:D019547), pain (MESH:D010146), neck disability (MESH:D006258)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904142/full.md

## References

13 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904142/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11904142