# Preterm Cesarean Delivery and Safety of Subsequent Delivery: Risk of Uterine Rupture and Other Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes—Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

**Authors:** Sarit Helman, Shira Fridman Lev, Amy Solnica, Orna Reichman, Rivka Farkash, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Maayan Bas Lando

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm14051522 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-02-24

## TL;DR

This study finds that trying vaginal birth after a preterm cesarean is as safe as after a term cesarean, with no higher risk of uterine rupture.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that prior preterm cesarean delivery does not increase uterine rupture risk during subsequent labor.

## Key findings

- No significant difference in uterine rupture rates between prior preterm and term cesarean deliveries.
- Higher rates of subsequent preterm delivery and successful VBAC in the preterm cesarean group.
- No increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes after preterm cesarean.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The safety of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) following prior preterm low-segment transverse cesarean delivery (pCD) was compared to that following term low-segment transverse cesarean delivery (tCD) in terms of the rate of uterine rupture (UR) and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the delivery outcomes among women with a prior primary pCD and those with a primary tCD. The primary outcome was UR, defined as a full-thickness uterine wall defect. The secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal morbidities. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann–Whitney tests, with the results reported as means ± SDs or medians + interquartile ranges (IQRs), were employed. Results: The cohort comprised 5340 women, including 186 with a prior pCD and 5154 with a prior tCD. The median gestational age at pCD was 28 weeks, compared to 39 weeks for tCD. Women in the pCD group had higher rates of hypertensive disorders (20.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001). No significant difference in UR incidence was observed at subsequent delivery (0% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.3). However, the pCD group had higher rates of subsequent preterm delivery (19.9% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.01) and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success (86.1% vs. 77.3%; p = 0.015). Adjusted analyses showed no significant association between pCD and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (OR = 0.796, 95% CI [0.487–1.301]; p = 0.363). Conclusions: This study underscores the safety of trial of labor after a primary preterm cesarean delivery, indicating no increased risk of uterine rupture compared to term cesarean deliveries. Care should be directed toward lowering subsequent preterm delivery and its associated risks.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** labor (MESH:D048949), UR (MESH:D014597), hypertensive disorders (MESH:D006973), tCD (MESH:D009188), preterm delivery (MESH:D047928)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11900145/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11900145/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11900145/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11900145