Revised safety evaluation of the food enzyme aqualysin 1 from the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain LMG S‐25520 produced by a modified process
Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Monika Sramkova, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Silvia Peluso, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz

TL;DR
A revised safety evaluation of a food enzyme produced by a genetically modified bacterium concludes it is safe for use in baking, though potential allergenic risks remain.
Contribution
The study confirms the safety of a modified food enzyme production process and identifies potential allergenic cross-reactivity.
Findings
The modified production process meets qualified presumption of safety (QPS) criteria and does not contain viable cells or DNA.
Aqualysin 1 showed homology to allergens, raising potential concerns about allergic reactions.
Dietary exposure is estimated at up to 0.385 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations.
Abstract
The food enzyme aqualysin 1 (EC 3.4.21.111) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain LMG S‐25520 by Puratos N.V. In a previous evaluation, the Panel could not exclude safety concerns due to an insufficient margin of exposure and noted the presence of recombinant DNA in all food enzyme batches tested. As a follow‐up, the applicant changed the manufacturing process and provided new data. These data established that the production strain meets the requirements for qualified presumption of safety (QPS) status, and no concerns arose from the modified food enzyme manufacturing process; hence, toxicological tests were not considered necessary. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in baking processes. Dietary exposure is estimated to be up to 0.385 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational exposure and asthma · Agricultural safety and regulations · Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
