Why dogs prefer zoomies to zoom and what it tells us about the importance of in-person meetings for learning and memory
Géraldine Coppin, Michael L. Onofrio

TL;DR
The paper explores how dogs and humans use smell for learning and communication, and why in-person interactions are better for memory than virtual meetings.
Contribution
It highlights the role of smell in learning and memory, contrasting in-person and virtual interactions.
Findings
Dogs and humans both use smell for learning and communication.
In-person meetings are more effective for memory than virtual ones.
Smell plays a significant role in information exchange.
Abstract
As people commonly observe dog behaviors like the sudden bursts of physical movement colloquially known as “zoomies,” and the canine penchant for sticking their nose out of car windows and for sniffing intently in dog parks, it is not surprising that people generally believe dogs learn and communicate by smell. While people generally discount their own olfactory sensitivity and the importance of smell overall, humans also learn and communicate by smell, in some cases even better than dogs. In this article, we discuss why this information exchange matters for learning and memory and why virtual meetings don’t pass the sniff test.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
