# Safety evaluation of the food enzyme β‐fructofuranosidase from the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐996

**Authors:** Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Monika Sramkova, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Ana Criado, Jaime Aguilera, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz, Daniele Cavanna, Giulio di Piazza, Cristina Fernández‐Fraguas, Eleonora Marini, Yi Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9287 · EFSA Journal · 2025-03-11

## TL;DR

This study evaluates the safety of a food enzyme produced by a genetically modified fungus and concludes it is safe for use in food manufacturing.

## Contribution

The study provides a comprehensive safety assessment of β-fructofuranosidase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain for food use.

## Key findings

- Genotoxicity tests and a 90-day toxicity study in rats showed no safety concerns.
- The enzyme's amino acid sequence does not match known allergens, though a low risk of allergic reactions cannot be excluded.
- The estimated dietary exposure results in a margin of exposure of at least 1653, indicating safety under intended use conditions.

## Abstract

The food enzyme β‐fructofuranosidase (β‐d‐fructofuranoside fructohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.26) is produced with the genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain AR‐996 by AB Enzymes GmbH. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. The food enzyme is intended to be used in three food manufacturing processes. Dietary exposure was estimated to be up to 0.605 mg total organic solids (TOS)/kg body weight per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 1653. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the β‐fructofuranosidase to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided and the derived margin of exposure, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Trichoderma reesei (taxon 51453), Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** allergic reactions (MESH:D004342), toxicity (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** organic (-)
- **Species:** Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116], Trichoderma reesei (species) [taxon 51453]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11894472/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11894472/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11894472