Clinical and physiological evaluation of free-ranging snow leopards immobilized with ketamine-xylazine in emergency situations
Animesh Talukdar, Anchal Bhasin, Dimpi Patel, Pankaj Raina, Prasad Tonde, Prateek Savita

TL;DR
This study shows that ketamine and xylazine safely immobilize wild snow leopards during emergencies, with stable vital signs and quick recovery.
Contribution
The study provides empirical evidence for a safe drug protocol for immobilizing wild snow leopards in emergency situations.
Findings
Ketamine-xylazine mixture induced immobilization within 3.85 minutes on average.
Physiological parameters remained within safe ranges during immobilization.
Recovery after reversal with yohimbine took an average of 24.92 minutes.
Abstract
The current study presents data on the immobilization and physiological responses of 26 distressed free-ranging snow leopards (Panthera uncia) in the trans-Himalayan regions of Ladakh, India, spanning three years from October 2020 to December 2023. Ketamine and xylazine were utilized in a drug mixture for rescue, rehabilitation, health assessment, and other capture purposes, with average doses of 6.535 ± 0.93 mgkg−1 and 1.937 ± 0.41 mgkg−1 of body weight, respectively. The average induction occurred at 3.85 ± 1.8 min. Respiratory rate, rectal temperature, and heart rate were monitored periodically post-induction, all remaining within clinically acceptable ranges. Following an average recumbency period of 70.69 ± 16.56 min, immobilizations were reversed using intramuscular injections of Yohimbine at 0.147 ± 0.03 mgkg−1 of body weight, leading to complete recovery within an average time…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1| Parameters | Unit |
| Mean ± SD | CV (%) | Central 95% interval | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xylazine HCL | mgmL−1 | 26 | 1.937 ± 0.41 | 0.212 | 1.77–2.10 | 1.34–2.86 |
| Ketamine HCL | mgmL−1 | 26 | 6.535 ± 0.93 | 0.142 | 6.16–6.91 | 4.41–8.33 |
| Induction time | Minute | 26 | 3.85 ± 1.8 | 0.469 | 3.12–4.57 | 2–10 |
| RR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 26 | 30.65 ± 4.39 | 0.143 | 28.88–32.43 | 24–40 |
| RR 05–10 | /minute | 26 | 29.69 ± 3.22 | 0.109 | 28.39–30.99 | 22–36 |
| RR 10–15 | /minute | 26 | 28.64 ± 2.98 | 0.105 | 27.26–29.67 | 24–36 |
| RR 15–20 | /minute | 26 | 29.27 ± 2.62 | 0.089 | 28.21–30.33 | 25–35 |
| RR 20–25 | /minute | 26 | 30.27 ± 2.69 | 0.089 | 29.18–31.36 | 25–36 |
| RR 25–30 | /minute | 26 | 29.77 ± 1.88 | 0.063 | 29.01–30.53 | 28–34 |
| HR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 26 | 73.73 ± 11.95 | 0.162 | 68.90–78.56 | 60–98 |
| HR 05–10 | /minute | 26 | 73.00 ± 10.7 | 0.147 | 68.68–77.32 | 58–95 |
| HR 10–15 | /minute | 26 | 72.85 ± 10.25 | 0.141 | 68.71–76.99 | 58–90 |
| HR 15–20 | /minute | 26 | 73.19 ± 10.91 | 0.149 | 68.78–77.60 | 60–96 |
| HR 20–25 | /minute | 26 | 72.27 ± 9.28 | 0.131 | 68.42–76.05 | 60–90 |
| RT (on approach) | °C | 26 | 38.23 ± 0.48 | 0.011 | 37.76–38.7 | 36.66–39.27 |
| RT 05–10 | °C | 26 | 38.23 ± 0.48 | 0.013 | 35.1–39.33 | 37.22–39.27 |
| RT 10–15 | °C | 26 | 38.19 ± 0.41 | 0.012 | 37–39.44 | 37.5–38.95 |
| RT 15–20 | °C | 26 | 38.23 ± 0.37 | 0.011 | 37–39.44 | 37.5–39.17 |
| Recumbancy period | minute | 26 | 70.69 ± 16.56 | 0.234 | 64–77.38 | 48–120 |
| Yohimbine | mgkg−1 | 26 | 0.147 ± 0.03 | 0.203 | 0.134–0.158 | 0.088–0.20 |
| Complete recovery (After reversal) | minute | 26 | 24.92 ± 7.08 | 0.284 | 22.06–27.78 | 15–40 |
| Variables | Unit | Adult | Young | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean ± SD |
| Mean ± SD | |||
| Drug doses | ||||||
| Xylazine HCL | mgkg−1 | 16 | 1.916 ± 0.47 | 10 | 1.971 ± 0.31 | >0.05 |
| Ketamine HCL | mgkg−1 | 16 | 6.221 ± 0.65 | 10 | 7.04 ± 1.10 | <0.05 |
| Yohimbine | mgkg−1 | 16 | 0.153 ± 0.02 | 10 | 0.136 ± 0.03 | >0.05 |
| Clinical parameters | ||||||
| Induction time | Minute | 16 | 4.13 ± 2.16 | 10 | 3.40 ± 0.96 | >0.05 |
| Recumbancy period | Minute | 16 | 70.94 ± 12.89 | 10 | 70.30 ± 22.01 | >0.05 |
| Complete recovery (After reversal) | Minute | 16 | 25.44 ± 7.02 | 10 | 24.10 ± 7.47 | >0.05 |
| Physiological parameters | ||||||
| RR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 16 | 30.06 ± 4.84 | 10 | 31.60 ± 3.59 | >0.05 |
| RR 05–10 | /minute | 16 | 29.19 ± 3.25 | 10 | 30.5 ± 3.17 | >0.05 |
| RR 10–15 | /minute | 16 | 28.75 ± 3.06 | 10 | 28.00 ± 2.94 | >0.05 |
| RR 15–20 | /minute | 16 | 29.63 ± 2.94 | 10 | 28.70 ± 2.00 | >0.05 |
| RR 20–25 | /minute | 16 | 30.38 ± 2.91 | 10 | 30.10 ± 2.42 | >0.05 |
| RR 25–30 | /minute | 16 | 30.13 ± 2.09 | 10 | 29.20 ± 1.39 | >0.05 |
| HR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 16 | 72.56 ± 12.74 | 10 | 75.60 ± 10.94 | >0.05 |
| HR 05–10 | /minute | 16 | 71.31 ± 10.44 | 10 | 75.70 ± 11.11 | >0.05 |
| HR 10–15 | /minute | 16 | 71.25 ± 10.09 | 10 | 75.40 ± 10.50 | >0.05 |
| HR 15–20 | /minute | 16 | 72.13 ± 10.85 | 10 | 74.90 ± 11.37 | >0.05 |
| HR 20–25 | /minute | 16 | 71.00 ± 8.56 | 10 | 74.20 ± 10.89 | >0.05 |
| RT (on approach) | °C | 16 | 38.13 ± 0.57 | 10 | 38.26 ± 0.41 | >0.05 |
| RT 05–10 | °C | 16 | 38.09 ± 0.52 | 10 | 38.43 ± 0.31 | <0.05 |
| RT 10–15 | °C | 16 | 38.07 ± 0.31 | 10 | 38.38 ± 0.48 | >0.05 |
| RT 15–20 | °C | 16 | 38.15 ± 0.39 | 10 | 38.35 ± 0.34 | >0.05 |
| Variables | Unit | Female | Male | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean ± SD |
| Mean ± SD | |||
| Drug doses | ||||||
| Xylazine HCL | mgkg−1 | 15 | 2.041 ± 0.39 | 11 | 1.796 ± 0.41 | >0.05 |
| Ketamine HCL | mgkg−1 | 15 | 6.548 ± 0.98 | 11 | 6.519 ± 0.89 | >0.05 |
| Yohimbine | mgkg−1 | 15 | 0.147 ± 0.034 | 11 | 0.146 ± 0.02 | >0.05 |
| Clinical parameters | ||||||
| Induction time | Minute | 15 | 3.53 ± 1.96 | 11 | 4.27 ± 1.55 | >0.05 |
| Recumbency period | Minute | 15 | 69.73 ± 13.89 | 11 | 72.00 ± 20.32 | >0.05 |
| Recovery following reversal | Minute | 15 | 25.00 ± 7.91 | 11 | 24.82 ± 6.12 | >0.05 |
| Physiological parameters | ||||||
| RR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 15 | 31.67 ± 4.53 | 11 | 29.27 ± 3.97 | >0.05 |
| RR 05–10 | /minute | 15 | 29.93 ± 3.21 | 11 | 29.36 ± 3.35 | >0.05 |
| RR 10–15 | /minute | 15 | 27.60 ± 2.72 | 11 | 29.64 ± 3.02 | >0.05 |
| RR 15–20 | /minute | 15 | 28.40 ± 2.06 | 11 | 30.45 ± 2.91 | >0.05 |
| RR 20–25 | /minute | 15 | 29.73 ± 2.52 | 11 | 31.00 ± 2.86 | >0.05 |
| RR 25–30 | /minute | 15 | 29.53 ± 1.64 | 11 | 30.09 ± 2.21 | >0.05 |
| HR 05 (on approach) | /minute | 15 | 74.93 ± 13.35 | 11 | 72.09 ± 10.12 | >0.05 |
| HR 05–10 | /minute | 15 | 74.20 ± 12.52 | 11 | 71.36 ± 7.87 | >0.05 |
| HR 10–15 | /minute | 15 | 73.67 ± 11.96 | 11 | 71.73 ± 7.74 | >0.05 |
| HR 15–20 | /minute | 15 | 75.33 ± 13.09 | 11 | 70.27 ± 6.45 | >0.05 |
| HR 20–25 | /minute | 15 | 73.80 ± 11.16 | 11 | 70.09 ± 6.31 | >0.05 |
| RT (on approach) | °C | 15 | 38.27 ± 0.38 | 11 | 38.05 ± 0.65 | >0.05 |
| RT 05–10 | °C | 15 | 38.25 ± 0.47 | 11 | 38.19 ± 0.49 | >0.05 |
| RT 10–15 | °C | 15 | 38.27 ± 0.42 | 11 | 38.08 ± 0.36 | >0.05 |
| RT 15–20 | °C | 15 | 38.25 ± 0.35 | 11 | 38.19 ± 0.42 | >0.05 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman-Animal Interaction Studies · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Introduction
The snow leopard (Panthera uncia), known for its elusive nature and high-altitude habitat, faces significant threats throughout its range (1). According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, the snow leopard is currently listed as vulnerable, with population trends showing a decline (2). Distributed across Asian high mountain habitats in 12 countries, the snow leopard is a flagship species for conservation efforts in the Indian Himalayan region (3).
Although non-invasive ecological research methods are increasingly used to inform snow leopard conservation, there are still good reasons to develop protocol that conducts research and conservation that requires safely capturing, immobilizing, and releasing snow leopards (4), including telemetry-based studies (5–8, 27–29) morphometric studies (9, 10), managing conflict situations and health assessments (11, 12). Such investigations are necessary to know their activity pattern, health conditions, emergency health conditions, and other physiological details (4, 12).
Emergencies for wildlife rescue can range from natural disasters, accidents, mass relocation, etc. to closed human-wildlife interaction. Carnivores, when stressed in any of such conditions tend to be aggressive hence chemical immobilization is implemented for the safety of the animal and the personnel involved in the rescue operation. Chemical immobilization is a necessary component of conservation and management activities that involve capturing and handling snow leopards, when properly used it is safe and causes far less stress to captured animals (13). Ketamine-Xylazine immobilizations have been used historically for the immobilization of many species; both domestic and wild, including other free-ranging threatened carnivores (14). Similarly, Yohimbine has also been used historically as an antagonist against Xylazine for reversal in a variety of animal species (13). Various drug mixtures have been used to immobilize both captive and free-ranging snow leopards, including tiletamine-zolazepam, medetomidine-ketamine, ketamine-xylazine, and medetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam, but published information on the drug doses, clinical and physiological response of free-ranging snow leopards remains limited (15–18). Given the diversity of legal restrictions across the 12 countries that snow leopards inhabit, India has higher legal restrictions; thus, legal field-immobilizing drugs are limited to ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride (19, 20). There is a need to evaluate and share information available to help wildlife health professionals develop safe and flexible immobilization protocols. Therefore, our objective was to assess ketamine-xylazine drug combination immobilization’s physiological and clinical effects in free-ranging snow leopards in distress based on a standard set of clinical parameters to aid future research and conservation efforts of this iconic feline.
Materials and methods
Ethics approval statement
Not applicable. The study was carried out by compiling and analyzing data collected during routine rescue operations permitted by the Department of Wildlife Protection, Leh, Ladakh India. All the authors agree to participate in the publication. The work is presented for publication in the Frontiers in Veterinary Science – Anesthesiology and Animal Pain Management journal.
Study area
The study was conducted in the protected areas of Leh, Ladakh, which include Hemis National Park, Karakoram Wildlife Sanctuary, and Changthang Wildlife Sanctuary, as well as their adjacent areas (Figure 1). These areas fall under the western Trans-Himalayan region of India, with a total area of over 78,000 km^2^ and an altitudinal range of 2,700–7,560 m above sea level. The study area is located between longitudes of 32°15′ to 34°38′ N and latitudes of 75°36′ to 78°22′ E.
Map of the study area, Union Territory of Ladakh, India.
Study animal capture and immobilization
Between October 2020 to December 2023, 26 free-roaming snow leopards (11 males, 15 females), mean ± SD values for body mass was 29.69 ± 4.35 kg (21–40 kg) were immobilized to facilitate rescue and rehabilitation efforts from human-wildlife conflict situations linked to livestock depredation and displacement. In most cases of livestock depredation, the snow leopards were trapped by livestock owners inside animal shelters, who then informed the forest department for rescue, which promptly dispatched a rescue team. The time required to reach the rescue site depended on its location, but all rescues were carried out within eight hours of receiving the alert.
Since animals were trapped near human habitation as mentioned earlier, it was necessary to immobilize them chemically to reduce the risk of injury to animals and humans.
All the snow leopards were chemically immobilized using ketamine (KETAMINA, 100 mg/mL, Biowet Pulawy, Poland or VETALAR, 100 mg/mL, Parke Davis & Co., P.O. Box qq8 GPO, Detroit, Michigan 48,232, USA) in combination with xylazine (XYLAMED, 100 mg/mL, Bimeda, Cambridge, Ontario) at dose rates of 6 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively. In field or emergencies where the exact weight of the animal could not be determined before immobilization, the dosages loaded into the dart were based on estimated weight, approximated from the animal’s apparent size. Factors such as the animal’s health condition (e.g., if injured or stressed), state of excitement, and size were also considered. In cases where the animal was hurt or experiencing high stress, higher doses were selected to ensure rapid immobilization and for animals in a highly excited state. Smaller animals were often given relatively higher doses per estimated weight to account for quicker metabolism and stress responses. Once immobilized, the actual weight of the animal was recorded during processing, allowing for retrospective assessment of the dosage per kg of actual body weight. Initial dosages of 6 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg were estimated, with adjustments and additional doses administered if full immobilization was not achieved after the first attempt, based on the animal’s response. All individuals were healthy, and chemical capture was chosen accordingly. Captures were carried out in temperatures ranging from 28°C to −20°C. Darting was conducted on foot from distances ranging from 5 to 20 meters. The drug combination was administered remotely via a 3 mL dart into the right or left quadriceps muscle of each animal.
The immobilizing drug mixture was remotely administered using air-pressurized syringe projectors [Daninject CO_2_ Injection Rifle Model IM (DAN-INJECT ApS, Kolding, Denmark)]. Due to the availability of higher concentrations of drugs as 100 mgmL^−1^ for both ketamine and xylazine, 3 mL nylon darts were adequate with needle lengths of 30 mm and diameter of 1.5 mm for drug administration (N1530 needle, 17G x 1.25″ (1.5 mm x 30 mm).
Animal handling and monitoring
The free-ranging condition and rescue situation at times did not provide opportunities for documentation of all the events of drug induction and the recordings were limited to information after locating and capturing the animal. For each snow leopard, once it was determined that anesthesia was complete and it was safe to approach and handle the animals, we blindfolded, weighed using an industrial grade circular hanging spring balance (Capacity 25 kg – 100 kg), assessed health condition, performed treatment if necessary and collected tissue samples, while monitoring physiological parameters throughout. Rectal temperature (RT), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) were monitored every five minutes after induction for 30 min whenever possible, as most of the cases were for rescue operations and with human presence nearby after 30 min either reversal was administered for all the cases or kept inside transportation box within 30 min to ensure safety for human as well as for the animals. Based on tooth wear colour and body size, age was estimated for all the animals captured (5, 10).
Drug reversal
Drug reversal was facilitated by administering yohimbine (YOHIMBE, 10 mg/mL, Equimed USA) at a dose rate of 0.125 mgkg-1 body weight intramuscularly. We subsequently monitored the time post-reversal to eye and head movement followed by ‘able-to-stand’ time.
Data analysis
All the recorded data for the drug dose, induction, and reversal time along with clinical parameters and physiological variables were evaluated for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The data for the differences within each recorded variable between sex and age class were assessed separately due to the limited sample size. Since the data was not normally distributed, non-parametric tests (Mann Whitney U test) were conducted. All the statistical analyses were performed with a 95% level of significance using SPSS software (IBM Corporation, USA). Mean, standard deviation, confidence intervals (95%) along with sample size are reported for the entire sample set, and data are presented as Mean ± SD unless otherwise stated.
Results
All 26 captures showed complete immobilization with no adverse effect (such as hypothermia, hypothermia, tachycardia, bradycardia and deep or superficial respiration) was observed from any of the animal captured. Although physiological and clinical parameters (induction time, recumbency period, complete recovery period) were recorded for most snow leopards, for some individuals, parameters such as heart rate, rectal temperature, and respiratory rate could not be collected at 5 min intervals owing to challenging rescue and field situations including extreme climatic conditions (Tables 1–3).
Discussion
We found that a combination of ketamine-hydrochloride (administered at 6.535 ± 0.93 mgkg^−1^ body weight) and xylazine-hydrochloride (administered at 1.937 ± 0.41 mgkg^−1^ body weight) were adequate mixture/combinations to achieve the safe immobilization of free-ranging snow leopards for managing emergency such as rescue operations and health assessment. These two drug combinations have previously been used on snow leopards (15, 19, 21–25). In the current study, ketamine dose rate was found to be lower as compared to previous research findings (15, 18, 21, 22, 25) and almost similar to other studies (19, 24). Similarly, for xylazine dose obtained in the study was found to be lower than the study done previously (15) and similar to other previous studies (19, 25) and higher than studies conducted before (21, 22, 24, 26). We found that ketamine-xylazine drug combinations at an average ratio of 3.5:1 (3.5 mg ketamine is required per 1 mg of xylazine) was effective in inducing smooth and rapid anesthesia for free-ranging snow leopards for emergency management. We did note that a significantly higher ketamine dose was required for young animals, as an additional drug was required than the default dose for capturing the young animals, but there were no differences in effective dose between the sexes.
For the clinical parameters, it was found that on average induction time was complete within ten minutes which was similar to the previous findings (15, 24). No significant differences were found for clinical parameters between adult and young snow leopards, and the same was observed in the case of males and females.
All recorded physiological parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, and rectal temperature) were all within the normal limits (15). There is no significant difference found across sex for physiological parameters.
Yohimbine to reverse xylazine was effective at an average dose rate of 0.147 ± 0.03 mgkg^−1^ and was similar to previous findings (25). Yohimbine has long been used as an antagonist for xylazine-induced sedation and in other wild cats to hasten recovery (26). Though there were no significant differences found for the dose rate of yohimbine across age and classes.
In summary, this study presents a comprehensive clinical and physiological assessment of free-ranging snow leopards (Panthera uncia) immobilized with a ketamine-xylazine drug combination. The findings contribute valuable insights to snow leopard conservation efforts by providing consistent data from a significant number of animals immobilized with various drug mixtures in their natural habitat.
The physiological variables and drug doses documented in this study for the ketamine-xylazine mixture offer crucial information for managing field emergencies such as rescue operations and health assessments. These findings serve as reference values for physiological parameters that may be helpful in field emergency rescues. However, the doses should be modified according to animal conditions and situations.
Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation of physiological responses provides a foundation for future research and clinical practice in snow leopard conservation. By establishing primary values for vital signs and drug dosages, this study empowers conservationists and veterinarians to make informed decisions when managing the health of snow leopards in their natural habitat. However, more work is suggested in this direction.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Zhou C Li F Wen Q Price M Yang N Yue B. Characterization of microsatellites in the endangered snow leopard based on the chromosome-level genome. Mammal Res. (2021) 66:385–98. doi: 10.1007/s 13364-021-00563-w 33605798 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Mccarthy T., Mallon D.Jackson R.Zahler P Mccarthy K. (2017). Panthera uncia. The IUCN red list of threatened species.
- 3Fox JL Chundawat RS Kachel S Tallian A JohanssonÖ. What is a snow leopard? Behavior and ecology In: Snow leopards. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. (2024). 15–29.
- 4JohanssonÖKachel S Weckworth B. Guidelines for telemetry studies on snow leopards. Animals. (2022) 12:1663. doi: 10.3390/ani 12131663, PMID: 35804562 PMC 9264895 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5JohanssonÖRauset GR Samelius G Mc Carthy T Andrén H Tumursukh L. Land sharing is essential for snow leopard conservation. Biol Conserv. (2016) 203:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.034 · doi ↗
- 6JohanssonÖSimms A Mc Carthy T. From VHF to satellite GPS collars: advancements in snow leopard telemetry In: Snow leopards. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. (2016). 355–65.
- 7KCA. Satellite telemetry on snow leopards in Kangchenjunga conservation area. Taplejung: Kangchenjunga Conservation Area Office (2019).
- 8Yu C Ding N Li Y Liu Y Lyu Z Munkhtsog B. Preliminary results from applying satellite-tracking on snow leopards for the first time in China. Global Ecol Conserv. (2022) 40:e 02346. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e 02346 · doi ↗
