# Patient-Selection of a Clinical Trial Primary Outcome: The ENHANCE-AF Outcomes Survey

**Authors:** Randall S. Stafford, Eli N. Rice, Rushil Shah, Mellanie T. Hills, Julio C. Nunes, Katie DeSutter, Amy Lin, Karma Lhamo, Bryant Lin, Ying Lu, Paul J. Wang, Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng, Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng, Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318858 · PLOS One · 2025-03-07

## TL;DR

This study found that patients with atrial fibrillation prefer the Decisional Conflict Scale to measure their decision-making experiences in anticoagulant use.

## Contribution

The study identified a patient-preferred primary outcome for a clinical trial on anticoagulant decision-making in atrial fibrillation.

## Key findings

- 77% of participants preferred the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) over the Decision Regret Scale (DRS).
- Higher CHA2DS2VASc scores were associated with a weaker preference for the DCS.
- The DCS was selected as the primary endpoint for the ENHANCE-AF clinical trial based on patient preferences.

## Abstract

Before the initiation of the ENHANCE-AF clinical trial, which tested a novel digital shared decision-making tool to guide the use of anticoagulants in stroke prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation, this study aimed to identify the most appropriate, patient-selected primary outcome and to examine whether outcome selection varied by demographic and clinical characteristics.

Our cross-sectional survey asked 100 participants with atrial fibrillation to rank two alternative scales based on the scales’ ability to reflect their experiences with decision-making for anticoagulation. The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a 16-item scale, measures perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options. The 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS) focuses on remorse after a healthcare decision. We included adults with non-valvular AFib and CHA2DS2VASc scores of at least 2 for men and 3 for women. Multivariable logistic regression with backward selection identified characteristics independently associated with scale choice.

The DCS was chosen over the DRS by 77% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68 to 85%] of participants. All subgroups designated a preference for the DCS. Those with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores (≥5, n = 26) selected the DCS 54% of the time compared with 86% of those with lower scores (<5, n = 74; p =  0.002). Multiple logistic regression confirmed a weaker preference for the DCS among those with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores.

Individuals with atrial fibrillation preferred the DCS over the DRS for measuring their decision-making experiences. As a result of this survey, the DCS was designated as the ENHANCE-AF clinical trial’s primary endpoint.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** atrial fibrillation (MONDO:0004981), stroke (MONDO:0005098)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** stroke (MESH:D020521), atrial fibrillation (MESH:D001281)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11888126/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11888126/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11888126/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11888126