# Occupational therapist’s involvement in social prescribing: A qualitative interview study

## TL;DR

This study explores how occupational therapists in the UK are involved in social prescribing and how they see their role evolving alongside this approach.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into occupational therapists' perspectives on social prescribing roles and their desired future contributions.

## Key findings

- Occupational therapists see similarities with social prescribing but struggle with role positioning and identity.
- Workflow delegation to social prescribing workers is common but lacks clarity on competence and supervision.
- Participants desire clearer workflows and greater occupational therapy involvement in supervision and service development.

## Abstract

Social prescribing is a process of helping people to access non-medical activities to promote well-being. For occupational therapists, this is not new, although the social prescribing agenda is creating new roles around these approaches. This study aimed to explore how occupational therapists were involved in social prescribing in the United Kingdom and how they would like to contribute to future developments.

Semistructured interviews were carried out with 19 occupational therapists who identified they were involved in social prescribing activities.

Thematic analysis led to two over-arching themes: (1) position and identity; and (2) making it work.

Participants perceived similarity with social prescribing, leading to difficulty in positioning occupational therapy alongside this role, emotional responses and identity challenge. Points of distinction between the roles were articulated, including occupational therapy being more medical, having oversight of more complex needs and having more senior roles within teams. To manage workflow, occupational therapists delegate to social prescribing workers, although there is a lack of clarity about competence and varying involvement in supervision. Part of desired future involvement included clearer workflow, occupational therapy involvement in supervision and service development and creating legitimacy for both roles to address social determinants of health.