# Stability of cytokine, cellular and clinical response to the intravenous LPS challenge repeated after one year: a healthy volunteer trial

**Authors:** Anselm Jorda, Lena Pracher, Sabine Eberl, Alina Nussbaumer-Pröll, Maysa Sarhan, Maria Weber, Markus Wahrmann, Valentin al Jalali, Felix Bergmann, Marlene Prager, Amelie Leutzendorff, Maria Sanz-Codina, Lara Tegrovsky, Theresa Pecho, Bernd Jilma, Lena Müller, Andreas Spittler, Marianne Rocha-Hasler, Julia Eckl-Dorna, Anna Kusienicka, Matthias Farlik, Markus Zeitlinger

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00430-025-00823-5 · Medical Microbiology and Immunology · 2025-03-06

## TL;DR

This study shows that while immune responses to LPS are somewhat consistent over a year, symptoms and vital signs vary.

## Contribution

Demonstrates long-term stability of cytokine and cellular responses to LPS in healthy volunteers.

## Key findings

- Most cytokines and leukocyte subsets showed strong intra-individual correlations between LPS challenges.
- Clinical symptoms and vital signs were not reproducible between the two LPS challenges.
- IL-6 and TNF-alpha responses were significantly attenuated in the second LPS challenge.

## Abstract

Whether the magnitude of individual cytokine, cellular, and clinical responses to the intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge is constant in individuals over extended time periods is unknown. Nine healthy volunteers received an intravenous LPS injection of 2 ng/kg bodyweight twice at intervals of at least one year. Circulating cytokines and leukocyte subsets were quantified using a multiplex immunoassay and cytometry by time-of-flight, respectively. Self-reported symptoms and vital signs were also assessed. We observed moderate to strong intra-individual correlations in the responsiveness of most cytokines (IL-6 [AUC0 − 10]: R = 0.93, p < 0.001; CRP [mg/dL]: R = 0.88, p = 0.004; IL-8 [AUC0 − 10]: R = 0.71, p = 0.031; TNF-alpha [AUC0 − 10]: R = 0.67, p = 0.047; IL-10 [AUC0 − 10]: R = 0.42, p = 0.26) and cellular subsets (CD8 T lymphocytes: R = 0.9, p = 0.002; B lymphocytes [G/L]: R = 0.89, p = 0.003; CD4 T lymphocytes: R = 0.84, p = 0.001; neutrophils: R = 0.80, p = 0.017; monocytes: R = 0.16, p = 0.710) between the 1st and 2nd LPS challenges. Vital signs and symptoms were not reproducible. While the average cellular and clinical response was similar between the two LPS challenges, we found a significantly attenuated AUC0 − 10 of IL-6 (percent difference, -41.9% [95% CI -73.0 – -10.7]) and TNF-alpha (percent difference, -35.7% [95% CI -70.0 – -1.6]) at the 2nd LPS challenge. Individual cytokine and cellular responses to intravenous LPS showed a significant degree of correlation when measured more than one year apart. These correlations did not translate to the reproducibility of clinical symptoms and vital signs, which showed greater variability and were not constant over time. The partly reduced cytokine release in the 2nd LPS challenge might be interpreted as an indicator of a long-lasting tolerance to endotoxin.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00430-025-00823-5.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** IL6 (interleukin 6), CRP (C-reactive protein), CXCL8 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8), TNF (tumor necrosis factor), IL10 (interleukin 10)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** TNF (tumor necrosis factor) [NCBI Gene 7124] {aka DIF, IMD127, TNF-alpha, TNFA, TNFSF2, TNLG1F}, CD4 (CD4 molecule) [NCBI Gene 920] {aka CD4mut, IMD79, Leu-3, OKT4D, T4}, IL10 (interleukin 10) [NCBI Gene 3586] {aka CSIF, GVHDS, IL-10, IL10A, TGIF}, CRP (C-reactive protein) [NCBI Gene 1401] {aka PTX1}, IL6 (interleukin 6) [NCBI Gene 3569] {aka BSF-2, BSF2, CDF, HGF, HSF, IFN-beta-2}, CD8A (CD8 subunit alpha) [NCBI Gene 925] {aka CD8, CD8alpha, IMD116, Leu2, p32}, CXCL8 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8) [NCBI Gene 3576] {aka GCP-1, GCP1, IL8, LECT, LUCT, LYNAP}

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11885351/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11885351/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11885351/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11885351