# No Evidence of Interaction Between FADS2 Genotype and Breastfeeding on Cognitive or Other Traits in the UK Biobank

**Authors:** Giulio Centorame, Nicole M. Warrington, Gibran Hemani, Geng Wang, George Davey Smith, David M. Evans

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s10519-024-10210-0 · Behavior Genetics · 2024-12-09

## TL;DR

This study found no evidence that FADS2 gene variants interact with breastfeeding to affect cognitive or other traits in a large UK population.

## Contribution

The study provides a large-scale replication attempt that refutes earlier claims of a gene-breastfeeding interaction on cognitive traits.

## Key findings

- FADS2 alleles were associated with changes in cholesterol, triglycerides, and offspring count, but not cognitive traits.
- No interaction between FADS2 genotype and breastfeeding was found for any trait tested.
- Earlier positive findings are likely due to uncontrolled population structure.

## Abstract

Breastfeeding is hypothesised to benefit child health and cognitive functioning by providing long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are essential for brain development. In 2007, Caspi et al. found evidence in two cohorts for an interaction between genetic variation in the FADS2 gene (a gene involved in fatty acid metabolism) and breastfeeding on IQ. However, subsequent studies have provided mixed evidence for the existence of an interaction. We investigated the relationship between genetic variation in the FADS2 region, breastfeeding, and their interaction in up to 335,650 individuals from the UK Biobank. We tested for the interaction over a range of cognitive functioning tests, as well as educational attainment and other traits thought to be influenced by breastfeeding, including cardiometabolic traits, number of offspring, and atopic allergy. FADS2 alleles associated with an increase in docosahexaenoic acid in blood serum (the C allele of rs174575) were associated with decreased verbal-numerical reasoning (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=2.28\times {10}^{-5}$$\end{document}p=2.28×10-5) and triglycerides (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=1.40\times {10}^{-41}$$\end{document}p=1.40×10-41), increased number of offspring (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=3.40\times {10}^{-5}$$\end{document}p=3.40×10-5), total cholesterol (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=5.28\times {10}^{-36}$$\end{document}p=5.28×10-36), HDL (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=1.42\times {10}^{-51}$$\end{document}p=1.42×10-51), and LDL cholesterol (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$p=1.46\times {10}^{-21}$$\end{document}p=1.46×10-21). We observed no evidence of an interaction in any of the traits, regardless of the modelling strategy on any cognitive or non-cognitive traits. We postulate that the previous positive findings are likely to be spurious, perhaps due to lack of appropriate control for latent population structure.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10519-024-10210-0.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** FADS2 (fatty acid desaturase 2) [NCBI Gene 9415]
- **Chemicals:** docosahexaenoic acid (PubChem CID 445580)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** FADS2 (fatty acid desaturase 2) [NCBI Gene 9415] {aka D6D, DES6, FADSD6, LLCDL2, SLL0262, TU13}
- **Diseases:** atopic allergy (MESH:D006969)
- **Chemicals:** fatty acid (MESH:D005227), docosahexaenoic acid (MESH:D004281), long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (-), triglycerides (MESH:D014280), cholesterol (MESH:D002784)
- **Mutations:** rs174575

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11882634/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11882634/full.md

## References

1 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11882634/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11882634