# Prediction of higher ceftazidime–avibactam concentrations in the human renal interstitium compared with unbound plasma using a minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model developed in rats and pigs through microdialysis

**Authors:** Maxime Vallée, Vincent Aranzana-Climent, Jérémy Moreau, Isabelle Lamarche, Théo Fontanier, Céline Barc, Nathalie Kasal-Hoc, Céline Debiais-Delpech, Hélène Mirfendereski, Jérémy Pezant, Anne Pinard, Jonathan Clarhaut, William Couet, France Cazenave-Roblot, Sandrine Marchand

PMC · DOI: 10.1128/aac.01518-24 · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2025-02-06

## TL;DR

This study shows that ceftazidime–avibactam reaches higher concentrations in kidney tissue than in blood, suggesting lower doses may be effective in humans.

## Contribution

A minimal PBPK model predicts higher renal interstitial concentrations of CZA in humans based on rat and pig microdialysis data.

## Key findings

- CZA concentrations in kidney were higher than in blood, with kidney-to-plasma AUC ratios exceeding one in both rats and pigs.
- The PBPK model accurately described CZA pharmacokinetics in animal tissues and predicted similar patterns in humans.
- Muscle and blood concentration profiles of CZA were nearly identical, with AUC ratios close to one.

## Abstract

Last resort antibiotics, like ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA), were used to treat urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. However, no data on tissue distribution were available. Our aim was to describe the in vivo kidney distribution of CZA in healthy rats and pigs using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK). Microdialysis probes were inserted into the blood, muscle, and kidney of both species. The experiment started with a retrodialysis by drug period. An i.v. single dose of CZA was administered. Samples were collected for 3 h in rats and 7 h in pigs. A PBPK model was developed to describe tissue and blood CZA pharmacokinetics in animals and to predict human concentrations. The PBPK model adequately described CZA rat and pig data in each tissue and blood. In both species, the concentration profiles of CZA in muscle and blood were almost superimposed, with muscle-to-plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratios close to one. However, kidney CZA concentrations were higher than those in blood, as indicated by kidney-to-plasma AUC ratios exceeding one (respectively 2.27 in rats and 2.63 in pigs for ceftazidime [CAZ]; 2.7 in rats and 4.5 in pigs for avibacam [AVI]). Prediction of human concentrations led to same observations. This study demonstrated an excellent penetration of CZA into the renal parenchyma of rats and pigs. Our PBPK model adequately described the data, and AUCs were higher in the renal cortex interstitium compared with unbound plasma. Our data suggested that the joint PK/PD target for CZA in humans could be attained with reduced CZA doses.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ceftazidime–avibactam (PubChem CID 90643431), CZA (PubChem CID 44483253), ceftazidime (PubChem CID 5481173), avibactam (PubChem CID 9835049)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090), Sus scrofa (taxon 9823)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** urinary tract infections (MESH:D014552)
- **Species:** Rattus norvegicus (brown rat, species) [taxon 10116], Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11881572/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11881572/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11881572/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11881572