# Dissonance as a productive force in the emergence of alternative crisis support and impetus for social change—principles and organizational form of the association Open Dialogue Leipzig e.V

**Authors:** Thomas Klatt, Lea Goncalves Crescenti, Therese Kruse, Irene Nenoff-Herchenbach, Sarah Schernau, Sebastian von Peter

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1426116 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2025-02-19

## TL;DR

This paper explores how dissonance drives the development of alternative crisis support through the example of Open Dialogue Leipzig e.V., a community-based organization in Germany.

## Contribution

The study contributes a novel analysis of how grassroots democratic structures and participatory learning foster innovative crisis intervention models.

## Key findings

- Open Dialogue Leipzig e.V. successfully adapts the OD approach to local conditions through grassroots democratic principles.
- The organizational form of the association facilitates participatory learning and professionalization in crisis intervention.
- The model demonstrates potential as a replicable example for alternative mental health support systems.

## Abstract

This article examines the productivity of dissonance in the development of alternative crisis intervention methods, using the German example of the “Open Dialogue Leipzige.V.” The research provides detailed insights into the development of the association and the adaptation of the OD approach to local circumstances.

The presentation is based on a participatory research process, primarily processing interview data using the Grounded Theory Method. It analyzes the specific practices of implementing Open Dialogue within the association and the organizational and contextual conditions corresponding with it.

Despite the challenges accompanying the introduction and sustainability of Open Dialogue in the German healthcare system, the organizational structure of the association—characterized by grassroots democratic principles and a community driven by a strong willingness to change—enables a successful application of Open Dialogue principles.

The article critically illuminates how engagement, professionalization, and participatory learning mutually influence each other through the organizational form of the association, bringing forth an innovative crisis intervention that could potentially serve as a model for other contexts.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** OD (OMIM:165800)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11880860/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11880860/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11880860