Surveillance for Chlamydia trachomatis variants escaping detection with the Aptima Combo 2 assay in Canada from 2019 to 2021
Felicia Roy, Jennifer Beirnes, Jason J. LeBlanc, Suzanne Gibbons, Aida Sivro, Alberto Severini

TL;DR
This study found rare Chlamydia trachomatis variants in Canada that could escape detection by a common molecular test, highlighting the need for updated testing and ongoing genetic surveillance.
Contribution
The study reports the presence of C. trachomatis escape variants in Canada and validates a reformulated test to detect them.
Findings
15 (4.8%) specimens carried C. trachomatis variants with AC2 target site mutations.
A reformulated AC2 assay successfully detected all specimens with escape mutations.
Target site mutations were rare but highlight the need for genetic surveillance and updated testing.
Abstract
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the method of choice for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosis, but these strategies are susceptible to target site mutations. C. trachomatis variants escaping detection with the Aptima Combo 2 (AC2) assay on the Hologic Panther instrument from 23S rRNA mutations have been reported in Nordic countries, England, Japan, and the United States. Given the potential for false negative results, this study investigated whether strains of C. trachomatis with AC2 target site mutations were present in Canada. Surveillance was conducted in Canadian laboratories from 2019 to 2021. Specimens suspected of AC2 target site mutations included those with low-value detections on the AC2 assay, with subsequent high-value detections on the Aptima Chlamydia Trachomatis (ACT) assay used for confirmatory testing. Specimens with AC2/ACT discrepant results were subjected to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Description | Province | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | BC | ON | QC | SK | Total | |
| C1515T (FI-nvCT) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| C1514T | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| C1522T | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| G1523A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| G1526A | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| WT (serovar D) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| WT (serovar E) | 6 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 47 |
| WT (serovar J) | 39 | 8 | 28 | 20 | 5 | 100 |
| Sequencing failed | 49 | 6 | 35 | 33 | 23 | 146 |
| Total | 106 | 24 | 74 | 76 | 33 | 313 |
| NML identifier | Results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23S rRNA mutation | AC2 (RLU) | ACT (RLU) | qPCR (Cp) | Reformulated AC2 (RLU) | |
| CLM20-1137 | C1514T | 70 | 7258 | 27.28 | 556 |
| CLM20-1139 | C1514T | 82 | 7081 | 20.04 | 393 |
| CLM21-1417 | C1514T | 38 | 6641 | 23.62 | 457 |
| CLM21-1442 | C1514T | 33 | 6936 | 27.63 | 417 |
| CLM19-5277 | C1514T | 53 | 6109 | 29.29 | 360 |
| CLM19-5283 | C1514T | 26 | 6078 | 30.55 | 401 |
| CLM19-5517 | C1514T | 90 | 7600 | 20.87 | 396 |
| CLM21-1455 | C1514T | 47 | 9112 | 27.64 | 405 |
| CLM22-0087 | C1522T | 26 | 7013 | 28.39 | 423 |
| CLM19-5278 | G1523A | 88 | 8110 | 33.73 | 594 |
| CLM21-1393 | G1526A | 32 | 6733 | 29.46 | 533 |
| CLM21-1402 | G1526A | 53 | 6327 | 25.60 | 591 |
| CLM21-1405 | G1526A | 53 | 6903 | 24.35 | 549 |
| CLM22-0090 | G1526A | 54 | 6749 | 30.91 | 650 |
| CLM22-0089 | G1526A | 38 | 6799 | 30.35 | 649 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive tract infections research · Urinary Tract Infections Management · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
OBSERVATION
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) remains the most prevalent bacterial STI, with an estimated 130 million new infections reported globally each year (1). Clinical sequelae can include pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility; however, as asymptomatic infections are common, many CT infections go unnoticed without routine screening (2). Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) like real-time PCR and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) have been the most frequent NAATs used in clinical and public health laboratories, often with concomitant detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (or gonococcus [GC]) (3, 4). Like any molecular method (5), NAATs for CT/GC are designed to target conserved genomic regions, but mutations can arise over time with microbial evolution. If sequence mismatches occur within the NAAT target site, reduced sensitivity or detection failure could ensue (5–10).
False negative CT results occurred on a commonly used commercial NAAT for CT/GC testing, the Hologic Aptima Combo 2 (AC2) assay on the Panther instrument (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) (11–17). The culprit termed the Finnish new variant of CT (FI-nvCT) harbored a 23S rRNA C1515T mutation, corresponding to the target site of the acridinium probe used for the CT detection. The emergence of FI-nvCT causing false negative results prompted surveillance in many countries (11–17). This variant along with other diagnostic escape mutations (i.e., C1514T, A1518G, C1522T, G1523A, and G1526A) were identified in Finland, and other Nordic countries (i.e., Sweden, Norway, and Denmark), England, Japan, and recently the United States (11–17). This study reports surveillance for CT diagnostic escape mutants on the AC2 assays in Canada from June 2019 to August 2021, prior to the introduction of a new reformulated assay with a novel CT probe.
Swab or urine specimens in Aptima Specimen Transport Media were submitted to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML, Winnipeg, MB) from participating Canadian provincial public health laboratories across five Canadian provinces (i.e., Alberta [AB], British Columbia [BC], Ontario [ON], Quebec [QC], and Saskatchewan [SK]). As per previous recommendations (12), eligible samples were those with equivocal results on the AC2 CT/GC assay on the Panther instrument with relative light unit (RLU) values between 25 and 99, that were positive (>100 RLU) following reflex testing on the Aptima Chlamydia Trachomatis (ACT) assay (which detects an alternative CT-specific target, the 16S rRNA). All eligible samples were queued for 23S rRNA gene sequencing targeted by the AC2 assay. For each specimen, 500 µL were processed as per manufacturer instructions using the DNA and Viral NA Large Volume Kit (Roche Diagnostics, cat# 06374891001) on a MagNAPure 96 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC), and nucleic acids were eluted in 50 µL. For 23S rRNA gene sequencing, a nested RT-PCR protocol was provided by Dr. Damon Getman (Scientific Director), Hologic Inc. The first round RT-PCR was performed with 5 µL of template in 25 µL reactions using primers and concentrations defined in Table S1, and the buffer and enzymes from the Invitrogen SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platinum Taq (Invitrogen, Cat. # 12574026). Amplification conditions were as follows: reverse transcription (55°C, 30 min), initial denaturation (94°C, 2 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 15 s), annealing (56.5°C, 30 s), and extension (68°C, 1 min). After final elongation (68°C, 5 min), amplicons were held at 4°C until use. The second round of PCR was performed in 25 µL reactions consisting of primers (Table S1), 1 µL of template from the first-round reaction, and buffers and enzymes from the OneStep Ahead RT-PCR kit (Qiagen Inc., Cat. # 220211). Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation (95°C, 5 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 10 s), annealing (56.5°C, 10 s), and extension (72°C, 10 s). Final elongation (72°C, 2 min) was followed by holding at 4°C until use. The resulting amplicons were visualized using the QIAxcel Advanced system (Qiagen, Cat. # 9001941), according to manufacturer instructions. Sanger sequencing was performed by the NML DNA Genomics Core Facility. Specimens yielding sequencing results were analyzed using the Vector NTI 11.5.3 and MEGA6 (18), with alignments to reference CT serovars D, E, and J using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Genbank database accession numbers CP007131.1, HE601870.1, and CP017741.1, respectively. Additionally, nucleic acids were subjected to an in-house real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting the Chlamydia trachomatis cryptic plasmid as previously described (19) and crossing point (Cp) values were recorded.
Of 313 samples submitted for sequencing, sequencing failures occurred in 146 (46.6%) (Table 1). This high proportion of specimens with low sequencing efficiency has been reported by others for AC2 equivocal specimens and is likely due to specimens with low bacterial loads falling below or near the limit of detection of the sequencing reactions (15, 20). Supporting this hypothesis, 93 (63.7%) of the 146 specimens with sequencing failures were negative for the cryptic plasmid (CP) target, with Cp values ≥40 using an in-house real-time qPCR. The Cp values of the diagnostic escape variants were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than those of strains with wild-type sequences, suggesting higher bacterial loads were present (Fig. S2). In total, 190 samples were CP positive, 115 were negative, and 8 were NSQ as tested by in-house real-time quantitative PCR.
Of the 167 successfully sequenced specimens, 152 (91.0%) contained wild-type 23S rRNA sequences. These sequences most closely resembled serovars D (5 [3.3%]), E (47 [31.0%]), and J (100 [65.8%]) within the target region (Fig. S1; Table 1). The remaining 15 sequences harbored mutations known to cause diagnostic escape with the AC2 assay (11–17): C1514T (n = 8), G1526A (n = 5), and one each with G1523A or C1522T (Fig. S1; Table 1). G1523A, C1514T, and C1522T were previously reported by others (13–15, 21), but the G1526A mutation was more recently described in the United States (11). No sequences corresponded to the other mutations causing detection failures for the AC2 assay, e.g., C1515T (16, 17) or A1518G (11).
While the proportion of CT diagnostic escape variants during the study period is estimated to be low (<0.01%), this may be underestimated due to the inherent biases of specimen selection (i.e., focus on equivocal samples) (11, 12), the voluntary submissions from participating laboratories, and the sensitivity limitations of sequencing methods. Parallel testing of all specimens with the AC2 and ACT assays (or between other NAATs) could be a solution to identify additional CT variant cases; however, this strategy was not possible with the high volumes of CT/GC testing occurring in clinical and public health laboratories. Regardless, the low proportion of CT variants seen in this study was consistent with other countries using a similar surveillance strategy (11–17). For example, the prevalence of AC2 diagnostic escape mutants (i.e., C1514T and G1523A) was <0.003% in England (13). Despite the low prevalence of diagnostic escape mutants observed in this and other studies, there was an ongoing risk of further transmissions. As seen with the Swedish novel CT variant (SW-nvCT) with NAATs used at the time, unrecognized circulation of variants can lead to significant disease spread (5–7). Hologic Inc. recently redesigned the AC2 assay to include an additional CT detection probe falling outside the region affected by the recent 23S rRNA diagnostic escape variants (11, 20, 21), which is a common strategy to mitigate NAAT target site mutations (5, 22–25). Following retesting with the reformulated AC2 assay, all specimens with CT variants from this study were found to be positive (Table 2).
Overall, the presence of mutations in the AC2 target region emphasizes the importance of conducting regular genomic surveillance to monitor the evolution and diversity of Chlamydia Trachomatis serovars circulating within the country.
Supplementary Material
Reviewer comments
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1World Health Organization (WHO). 2018. Report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/stis-surveillance-2018/en/. Retrieved 22 Feb 2022.
- 2Ahmadi MH, Mirsalehian A, Bahador A. 2016. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis with infertility and clinical manifestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Infect Dis (Lond) 48:517–523. doi:10.3109/23744235.2016.116042127064452 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Chernesky M, Jang D, Gilchrist J, Hatchette T, Poirier A, Flandin JF, Smieja M, Ratnam S. 2014. Head-to-head comparison of second-generation nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae on urine samples from female subjects and self-collected vaginal swabs. J Clin Microbiol 52:2305–2310. doi:10.1128/JCM.03552-1324696024 PMC 4097753 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Jang D, Ratnam S, Gilchrist J, Arias M, Smieja M, Mayne D, Chernesky MA. 2016. Comparison of workflow, maintenance, and consumables in the Gene Xpert Infinity 80 and Panther instruments while testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Dis 43:377–381. doi:10.1097/OLQ.000000000000044427196259 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Mc Cracken GR, Gaston D, Pettipas J, Loder A, Majer A, Grudeski E, Labbé G, Joy BK, Patriquin G, Le Blanc JJ. 2023. Neglected SARS-Co V-2 variants and potential concerns for molecular diagnostics: a framework for nucleic acid amplification test target site quality assurance. Microbiol Spectr 11:e 0076123. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00761-2337815347 PMC 10715164 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Ripa T, Nilsson P. 2006. A variant of Chlamydia trachomatis with deletion in cryptic plasmid: implications for use of PCR diagnostic tests. Euro Surveill 11:E 061109. doi:10.2807/esw.11.45.03076-en 17213548 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Sweeney EL, Bletchly C, Gupta R, Whiley DM. 2019. False-negative Chlamydia polymerase chain reaction result caused by a cryptic plasmid-deficient Chlamydia trachomatis strain in Australia. Sex Health 16:394–396. doi:10.1071/SH 1820531270010 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Unemo M, Clarke IN. 2011. The Swedish new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 24:62–69. doi:10.1097/QCO.0b 013e 32834204 d 521157332 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
