Safety and cost of selective histopathological analysis for detecting cancer in surgical specimens: a systematic review
Angelique N. Camilos, Leo C. Bowley Schubert, Marcela P. Castro, Silas D. Nann, Suzanne Edwards, Brandon Stretton, Aashray K. Gupta, Joshua G. Kovoor, Matthew Marshall‐Webb, Guy J. Maddern

TL;DR
This study finds that selectively analyzing surgical specimens for cancer based on visible abnormalities can save costs without missing many cancers.
Contribution
The novelty is evaluating the safety and cost-effectiveness of selective histopathological analysis across various surgeries.
Findings
Selective histopathology detected 196 malignant and 99 benign neoplasms across 26,126 patients.
Cost savings ranged from thousands to hundreds of thousands of Euros annually depending on scale.
Only 0.01 proportion of malignant neoplasms were missed with the selective approach.
Abstract
Due to limited healthcare resources, there is global incentive to maximize efficacy while minimizing patient harm. Given the low rate of cancer diagnoses made via routine histopathological analysis of surgical specimens, a selective approach has been proposed as a viable alternative. This systematic review aimed to evaluate effectiveness of cancer detection and costs with a selective approach. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022346535) and conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from earliest result (1973) to 30 July 2022 for studies evaluating selective histopathology for surgical specimens. Screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction were completed in duplicate. Statistical analysis used a random effects model. Searches identified 4194 records, with 11 studies included consisting of 26 126…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
