Patient Burden in Dystonia Diagnosis and Botulinum Toxin Treatment: A Nationwide Survey in Turkey

TL;DR

A survey in Turkey reveals significant delays and burdens faced by dystonia patients during diagnosis and botulinum toxin treatment, highlighting the need for improved healthcare access and treatment satisfaction.

Contribution

The study provides new insights into the real-world challenges faced by dystonia patients in Turkey, emphasizing unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment accessibility.

Findings

Approximately 15% of dystonia patients received incorrect initial diagnoses.

30.7% of patients traveled to another city for diagnosis, and 42.6% sought private clinics, causing financial and logistical burdens.

Patients with oromandibular dystonia were three times less likely to be satisfied with botulinum toxin treatment compared to those with facial dystonia.

Abstract

Understanding real‐world experiences is crucial in determining the potential gaps in patient‐centered healthcare in dystonia. We explored the challenges of people with dystonia (PwD) at the stages of diagnosis and botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment.

A multicenter survey was conducted face‐to‐face across seven university hospitals in Turkey. PwD receiving BoNT treatment for at least 6 months were invited. Data on demographics, diagnostic journeys, and treatment experiences were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression models.

A total of 789 PwD participated, reporting significant burdens during both diagnostic and treatment stages. Diagnosis was delayed by approximately 1 year, with 15% receiving incorrect initial diagnoses. Additionally, 30.7% of PwD traveled to another city, and 42.6% applied to private clinics for diagnosis, leading to a substantial logistic and financial burden. The treatment stage revealed that a quarter of PwD had to travel significant distances every 3 months, or applied to a private clinic to receive BoNT injections, creating considerable cost and effort. In addition, PwD with oromandibular dystonia were three times and task‐specific dystonia were around nine times less likely to be satisfied with BoNT treatment compared to facial dystonia. Alternative treatment was reported in 11%, with no substantial benefit.

The findings highlight critical unmet needs in the diagnostic and treatment processes for PwD. These include improvement in diagnostic accuracy, reduced travel and financial burdens, and enhanced treatment satisfaction. An action plan emphasizing resource utilization policies and educational activities for healthcare providers is essential to address these challenges.

Figures