# Prevalence, incidence, and thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera: a study based on longitudinal German health claims data

**Authors:** Karina C. Manz, Anja Mocek, Bashar Morouj, Katharina Merker, Marc Feuerbach, Ariane Höer, Valeria Weber, Raeleesha Norris, Susanne Grosser, Frank Andersohn, Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00277-025-06192-6 · Annals of Hematology · 2025-02-10

## TL;DR

This study estimates the prevalence and incidence of polycythemia vera in Germany and finds that many high-risk patients are not receiving recommended treatments, leading to thromboembolic events.

## Contribution

Provides the first detailed epidemiological data on polycythemia vera in Germany and highlights treatment guideline non-adherence.

## Key findings

- Polycythemia vera prevalence in Germany is 28.6 per 100,000 adults in 2021.
- 43.6% of high-risk PV patients did not receive recommended cytoreductive therapy.
- Ruxolitinib-treated patients had fewer thromboembolic events compared to hydroxyurea-treated patients after three years.

## Abstract

There is little evidence, particularly in Germany, on the epidemiology and the cytoreductive management of polycythemia vera (PV). We performed an observational study based on anonymized health claims data to provide estimates of the epidemiology of PV in Germany, to describe the use of cytoreductive drugs in patients with PV, and to assess the occurrence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in prevalent patients on continuous treatment with relevant cytoreductive drugs over time. For the year 2021, we estimated a PV prevalence of 28.6 per 100,000 and an incidence of 3.3 per 100,000 in the German adult population (≥ 18 years). We identified 83.2% of prevalent patients in 2021 as being at high risk for thromboembolic complications, based on age (≥ 60 years) and/or history of TEs. Contrary to treatment guidelines, 43.6% of these high-risk patients did not receive cytoreductive drug treatment in 2021. 63.5% of patients in 2021 who were treated with hydroxyurea (but not ruxolitinib) in that year, met our defined proxy criteria for intolerance/resistance to hydroxyurea. Over time, we observed a lower proportion of patients with TEs in patients continuously treated with ruxolitinib compared to patients treated with hydroxyurea who also met our defined proxy criteria for intolerance/resistance to hydroxyurea (35.8% vs. 56.3% after three years). Our findings suggest that currently available cytoreductive therapies are not being fully utilized according to treatment guidelines, which may lead to avoidable thromboembolic complications in this patient population.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00277-025-06192-6.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** hydroxyurea (PubChem CID 3657), ruxolitinib (PubChem CID 17754772)
- **Diseases:** polycythemia vera (MONDO:0009891)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** thromboembolic (MESH:D013923), PV (MESH:D011087)
- **Chemicals:** ruxolitinib (MESH:C540383), hydroxyurea (MESH:D006918)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11868326/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11868326/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11868326/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11868326