Protocol for a theory-based, mixed methods evaluation of Cynnau|Ignite: an active learning programme to foster positive research culture through leadership development at Cardiff University
Charlotte Hennah, Maleeha Rizwan, Nicola Edwards, Hayley Beckett, Michele Convery, Heidi Dawson, Jonathan Morris, Mair Rigby, James Vilares, Karin Wahl-Jorgensen, Rebecca Williams, Sofia Gameiro, Agnieszka Stachowiak, Agnieszka Stachowiak

TL;DR
Cardiff University is evaluating a leadership program called Cynnau|Ignite to improve research culture through active learning and leadership development.
Contribution
This paper introduces a theory-based mixed methods evaluation protocol for a novel leadership program aimed at fostering positive research culture.
Findings
Cynnau|Ignite will be evaluated for its effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility in improving research culture practices.
The program will be tested across three tailored groups within Cardiff University.
The evaluation includes measuring self-reported intentions and behaviors before and after the program.
Abstract
A recent UKRI call for training programmes to improve research culture at Higher Education Institutions led Cardiff University to design Cynnau|Ignite. This active learning programme intends to foster positive research culture practices through empowering staff towards leadership on this agenda, and by embedding learners in environments where these practices are highly valued. Cynnau|Ignite will be implemented within Cardiff University as three tailored programmes, dependant on job roles: Teaching and Research (64 learners), Research-Only (32 learners), and Professional Services, Technicians and Specialists (32 learners). This protocol details a theory-based, mixed methods evaluation of Cynnau|Ignite’s effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility as a tool to improve research culture practices and perceptions within Cardiff University. This knowledge will help inform future iterations…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Policy Implementation Science · Community Health and Development · Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
