Quality of information on fertility clinic websites accredited by the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction
Giselle Ferreira de Souza, Eduarda Maia Lima, Ana Clara Muniz Tavares, Camila Alves Rocha, Larissa Cruz de Souza, Júlia Machado Luz Simões, Nicole Oliveira de Araújo, Maria Yzadora Moura Martins, Marcelo Borges Cavalcante

TL;DR
This study found that fertility clinic websites in Latin America provide low-quality health information, with significant variation in quality between countries.
Contribution
The study evaluates the quality of information on fertility clinic websites accredited by REDLARA using the QUEST tool, revealing poor quality and country-specific disparities.
Findings
Most fertility clinic websites in Latin America lack authorship information and provide low-quality health information.
Brazil had the highest average website quality score, while Peru had the lowest.
REDLARA is recommended to implement guidelines for improving website quality.
Abstract
To access to reproductive health information on the Internet helps patients understand their infertility journey and make decisions about their treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of fertility clinic websites accredited by the Latin American Network for Assisted Reproduction (REDLARA) using the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). This observational, cross-sectional, and online study evaluated the clinic websites registered as accredited centers on the REDLARA website. The QUEST was used for the quality assessment of the websites. Data were collected from the available websites of all accredited fertility clinics between September 2023 and January 2024. A total of 173 websites from fertility clinics accredited by REDLARA were evaluated, and 152 (87.8%) clinics had functioning websites. The majority of analyzed websites were from Brazilian fertility clinics (n=58;…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Technologies · Web visibility and informetrics
