A multi-centre, participant-blinded, randomized, 3-year study to compare the efficacy of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) to Freehand Surgery (FHS) on bony union and quality of life outcomes for mandibular reconstruction with fibular and scapular free flaps: study protocol for a randomized phase II/III trial
Khanh Linh Tran, Sena Turkdogan, Anat Bahat Dinur, Thomas D. Milner, Edward Wang, Anthony Nichols, Danielle MacNeil, Adrian Mendez, Jake Jervis-Bardy, John De Almeida, Christopher Yao, David Goldstein, Ralph Gilbert, Antoine Eskander, Kevin Higgins, Danny Enepekides

TL;DR
This study compares Virtual Surgical Planning and Freehand Surgery for mandible reconstruction, focusing on bone healing and quality of life.
Contribution
A multi-center randomized trial protocol to evaluate VSP's efficacy over FHS in mandibular reconstruction using free flaps.
Findings
Assesses bony union rates, complications, and quality of life outcomes.
Compares economic burden and reconstruction accuracy between VSP and FHS.
Uses intention-to-treat analysis for patients unable to undergo VSP.
Abstract
Advanced head and neck malignancies with underlying bony involvement often require aggressive oncological resection of large segments of the oral cavity including the mandible. These patients require vascularized donor osseous free tissue transfer to reconstruct significant defects. Traditionally, the donor bone is harvested on its vascular supply and shaped to the defect in a free hand fashion (FHS). However, virtual surgical planning (VSP) has emerged as a method to optimize reconstructive outcomes and decrease operative time. The goals of this study are to assess superiority of VSP to FHS by comparing bony union rates at 12 months, short and long-term complication rates, reconstruction accuracy, quality of life (QOL), functional outcomes, and economic analysis. This is a multicenter phase II/III study randomizing four hundred twenty head and neck patients undergoing mandibulectomy…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Bone fractures and treatments
