Predictive accuracy of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure ratio versus TIMI score for short-term mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Rajesh Kumar, Naveed Ullah Khan, Ali Bin Naseer, Zille Huma, Kalsoom Chachar, Maryam Samad, Muhammad Ishaq, Abiha Urooj, Uroosa Safdar, Muhammad Rasool, Sohail Khan, Jawaid Akbar Sial, Tahir Saghir, Nadeem Qamar

TL;DR
This study compares the SBP/LVEDP ratio and TIMI score for predicting mortality in STEMI patients after primary PCI, finding both to be similarly effective.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that the SBP/LVEDP ratio is a rapid and effective alternative to the TIMI score for predicting mortality in STEMI patients.
Findings
Patients with SBP/LVEDP ≤5.4 had significantly higher in-hospital and short-term mortality rates.
The AUCs for SBP/LVEDP and TIMI were comparable for predicting both in-hospital and short-term mortality.
SBP/LVEDP is a readily available and practical tool for rapid prognostic assessment during primary PCI.
Abstract
Aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) ratio for the prediction of in-hospital and short-term mortality in a contemporary cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at a tertiary care cardiac center. This study included a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. The SBP/LVEDP ratio and TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score were calculated, and their ability to predict in-hospital and short-term mortality was evaluated by analyzing the area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. This study involved 977 patients, with 780 (79.8%) being male and a mean age of 55.6±11.5 years. Among them, 191 (19.5%) had an…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics · Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
