# Application of EUS or MRCP prior to ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis in clinical practice

**Authors:** Mike J.P. de Jong, Megan M.L. Engels, Christa Sperna Weiland, Robin Krol, Tanya M. Bisseling, Erwin-Jan M. van Geenen, Peter Siersema, Foke van Delft, Jeanin E. van Hooft

PMC · DOI: 10.1055/a-2475-0099 · Endoscopy International Open · 2025-01-07

## TL;DR

This study examines how well doctors follow guidelines for diagnosing and treating gallstones in the bile duct, showing that following the guidelines helps avoid unnecessary procedures.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence of adherence to ESGE guidelines for choledocholithiasis management and highlights the benefits of following them.

## Key findings

- Adherence to the ESGE guideline was highest in the intermediate-likelihood group (83.6%).
- Following the guidelines helped avoid 28.2% of unnecessary ERCPs through additional imaging.
- Stratification reduced the need for additional imaging and ERCPs in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

## Abstract

Background and study aims
Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis can be stratified according to the 2019 European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline into low-, intermediate- and high-likelihood groups for presence of choledocholithiasis. For the intermediate group, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is recommended to assess whether an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is necessary prior to cholecystectomy. The aim of the study was to investigate adherence to the guideline for diagnostic and treatment strategy for cholelithiasis in daily clinical practice.

Patients and methods
A multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional observational study of the diagnostic pathway of patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis was conducted between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified according to the ESGE guideline "Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones”.

Results
A total of 305 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into low- (17%), intermediate- (40%) and high- (43%) likelihood of choledocholithiasis. In these three categories, 182 patients (60%) underwent ERCP. Adherence to the ESGE guideline recommendation was 59.7% overall and was the highest in the intermediate-likelihood group (83.6%), compared with 45.1% in the low- and 43.2% in the high-likelihood group, respectively (
P
< 0.001). In the high-likelihood group, 49% underwent additional imaging. In 195 patients who underwent additional imaging, 55 ERCPs (28.2%) could be avoided.

Conclusions
This study shows that stratification according to the ESGE guideline is useful to reduce the number of unnecessary additional imaging procedures and ERCPs in patients with a suspicion of choledocholithiasis. It seems worthwhile to perform EUS prior to ERCP in the same session.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** choledocholithiasis (MONDO:0006699)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** choledocholithiasis (MESH:D042883), common bile duct stones (MESH:D042882), cholelithiasis (MESH:D002769)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11863547/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11863547/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11863547/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11863547