Relationship between different PANSS cognitive factors and cognition assessed with MCCB in patients with first psychotic episode of schizophrenia
R. Rodriguez-Jimenez, Á. Sánchez-Cabezudo, M. Scala, L. García-Fernández, L. Sánchez-Pastor, D. Rentero, I. Martínez-Gras, M. Caballero, J. M. Espejo-Saavedra, A. Nuñez-Doyle, O. Jiménez-Rodríguez, A. I. Aparicio-León, J. L. Santos

TL;DR
This study examines how two cognitive factors from the PANSS scale correlate with cognitive test results in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.
Contribution
The study compares Marder and Wallwork cognitive factors with MCCB assessments in first-episode schizophrenia patients.
Findings
Both PANSS cognitive factors moderately correlate with MCCB domains like speed of processing and working memory.
Weaker or non-significant correlations were found for visual learning and social cognition.
Marder and Wallwork factors showed similar patterns of correlation with MCCB scores.
Abstract
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) has been used as a universal instrument for clinical assessment of psychopathology in schizophrenia. Different studies have analyzed the factorial structure of this scale and have suggested a five-factor model: positive, negative, excited, depressive, and cognitive/disorganized factors. Two of the most used models are the Marder´s solution and the Wallwork´s one. The aim of this work was to study the correlations of the two cognitive factors (Marder and Wallwork) with a cognitive assessment performed with a standard cognitive battery, in a sample of patients with first psychotic episode of schizophrenia. Seventy four patients with first psychotic episode of schizophrenia (26.9, SD:7.8 years old; 70.3% male) were included. The cognitive assessment was performed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The MCCB present seven…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research · Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
