How good is the clinical diagnosis in schizophrenia? Reliability and validity
P. Falkai

TL;DR
This paper examines the reliability and validity of clinical diagnosis in schizophrenia and compares different classification systems for mental disorders.
Contribution
The paper provides a comparative analysis of classification systems like ICD-11, RDoC, and biomarkers for mental disorders.
Findings
Classification systems like ICD-11, RDoC, and biomarkers have overlapping and distinguishing features.
Each system serves different purposes and constituencies in understanding and classifying mental disorders.
Abstract
Several changes to the classification of mental disorders have been made during the past half century to increase the reliability, clinical use and validity of the diagnostic classification. Despite the high expansion of knowledge about mental disorders, understanding of their components and processes still requires fine-tuning. This symposium identifies key issues on different classification systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorders. We discuss how key issues such as ICD-11, RDoC or Biomarkers correspond or diverge because of their different purposes, and constituencies. Although these approaches have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder. None Declared
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health and Psychiatry · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
