# Olfaction-based learned preference assessment without the use of motivational fear or motivational weight loss

**Authors:** Sara E. Moss, Ekaterina S. McCurdy, Natalya N. Thomas, Danielle Gulick, Angela M. Poff, Dominic P. D'Agostino

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1521751 · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · 2025-02-12

## TL;DR

This study introduces a new method to assess learning in mice using smell, avoiding issues with fear or weight loss.

## Contribution

A novel olfaction-based learning protocol that bypasses traditional limitations like fear or sensory impairments.

## Key findings

- Mice showed stronger passive preference for sucrose over other sweeteners.
- Mice learned to associate scents with rewards without motivational weight loss.
- The protocol detected learning deficits caused by LPS administration.

## Abstract

Reliable assessments of learning ability in preclinical models are essential for studying neurodegenerative, developmental, and inflammatory disorders. However, many inbred strains of mice present background pathologies that interfere with traditional learning tests. The C57BL/6 J mouse, a widely used laboratory strain, sporadically develops auditory and visual impairments that complicate interpretation. In this study, we establish an olfaction-based learned preference protocol designed to evaluate learning ability independent of fear responses, motivational weight loss, or visual cues in C57BL/6 J mice.

Leveraging the species’ natural preference for sweet flavors, we tested different sweeteners and confirmed their passive preference for sucrose was more robust than for saccharin or sucralose. We then trained mice to associate either lemon or rose scents with a sucrose paste reward, and tested whether they demonstrated a learned preference for the sucrose-associated scent over the neutral scent. Mice developed an appetitive olfactory preference for sucrose as a reward, in the absence of motivational weight loss, as measured by time spent exploring a three-chamber association box with access to both scents. We assessed whether this protocol discriminated learning deficit induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration.

We conclude that this protocol is a viable tool for assessing learning abilities in preclinical models with auditory or visual deficits, motor impairments, or an inability to tolerate motivational weight loss.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** sucrose (PubChem CID 5988), saccharin (PubChem CID 5143), sucralose (PubChem CID 71485)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** learning deficit (MESH:D007859), weight loss (MESH:D015431), auditory and visual impairments (MESH:D014786), motor impairments (MESH:D000068079), neurodegenerative, developmental, and inflammatory disorders (MESH:D019636)
- **Chemicals:** LPS (MESH:D008070), saccharin (MESH:D012439), sucralose (MESH:C026285), sucrose (MESH:D013395)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Citrus x limon (lemon, species) [taxon 2708]
- **Cell lines:** C57BL/6 J — Mus musculus (Mouse), Transformed cell line (CVCL_C0MW)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861198/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861198/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861198/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861198