# Marginal adaptation analysis of CAD/CAM resin crown with non-invasive methods

**Authors:** Chen Zeng, Tomoko Tabata, Rena Takahashi, Masaomi Ikeda, Junichi Shinagawa, Hisaichi Nakagawa, Yumi Tsuchida, Shunsuke Takano, Yasunori Sumi, Yasushi Shimada

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00784-025-06215-6 · Clinical Oral Investigations · 2025-02-26

## TL;DR

This study compares two methods for assessing the fit of dental crowns and finds that SS-OCT works well at a 90° angle.

## Contribution

The study introduces SS-OCT as a non-invasive clinical alternative for evaluating crown fit at a 90° light incidence angle.

## Key findings

- SS-OCT at 90° showed no significant differences compared to the silicone replica method.
- Marginal discrepancies increased as the light incidence angle decreased from 90° to 60°.
- SS-OCT is a viable non-invasive method for clinical evaluation of crown fit.

## Abstract

This study compared the silicone replica method with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) to analyze marginal adaptation and investigated the effect of the light incidence angle of SS-OCT on measurement precision.

A typodont-prepared mandibular right first molar was scanned using an intraoral scanner (Trios 3). Fourteen crowns were fabricated from CAD/CAM resin blocks (Katana Avencia P) using a 5-axis milling machine (DWX-50). Marginal adaptation at the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal points was assessed using the silicone replica method and SS-OCT at light incidence angles of 60°, 75°, and 90°. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests with Bonferroni correction, and t-tests at a significance level of 0.05.

At 60°, SS-OCT showed significantly larger marginal discrepancies than the silicone replica method at the buccal, lingual, and mesial points (p < 0.05). At 75°, only the lingual point showed a significantly larger value than the silicone replica method (p < 0.05). At 90°, no significant differences were observed between the SS-OCT and silicone replica methods (p > 0.05). Marginal discrepancy values increased as the angle changed from 90° to 75° to 60°, with significant differences between 60° and 75° and between 60° and 90° at the buccal and lingual points (p < 0.05).

SS-OCT is a viable alternative to the silicone replica method for assessing marginal adaptation at an incidence angle of 90 °.

SS-OCT, a non-invasive method, has the potential to be applied clinically for evaluating marginal fit in indirect restorations in vivo.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** silicone (MESH:D012828)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861017/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861017/full.md

## References

9 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861017/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11861017