# The multiple self and psychological openness

**Authors:** Hubert Suszek, Maciej Kopera, Andrzej Jakubczyk

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441953 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2025-02-12

## TL;DR

This study shows that viewing oneself as having multiple, context-dependent aspects increases psychological openness compared to seeing oneself as a single, stable entity.

## Contribution

The study empirically demonstrates that activating a 'multiple self-mode' enhances psychological openness across various domains.

## Key findings

- Activation of the multiple self-mode increased psychological openness compared to the unitary self-mode.
- The effect was consistent across domains like openness to change and range of values.
- Moderate effect sizes were observed across different experimental manipulations and measures.

## Abstract

This research identifies and explores two distinct modes of self-experience and their influence on psychological openness. We distinguish between the unitary self-mode, where individuals perceive themselves as cohesive, stable entities, and the multiple self-mode, where they recognize their diverse, context-dependent aspects. These modes represent fundamentally different ways of experiencing and organizing self-knowledge that can be situationally activated. While both modes of self-experience have been theoretically described, their influence on psychological functioning remains empirically unexplored.

Through five experiments (N = 989), we tested whether activation of the multiple self-mode increases psychological openness compared to activation of the unitary self-mode using different experimental manipulations and measures.

Induction of the multiple self enhanced psychological openness compared to induction of the unitary self. This effect was consistently observed across various domains of openness: openness as a state (Study 1, N = 204), openness to change (Studies 3 and 4, N = 230 and N = 184), range of values (Studies 2 and 3, N = 212 and N = 230), psychological mindedness and decentering (Study 5, N = 159). Results consistently showed moderate effect sizes (d = 0.31–0.44) across different operationalizations of both the multiple self-induction and openness measures.

These findings indicate that the way in which individuals organize their self-knowledge has important implications for their cognitive and experiential flexibility, contributing to our understanding of personality plasticity and development.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** confusion (MESH:D003221), cognitive defusion (MESH:D003072), Behavioral rigidity (MESH:D009127), personality disorders (MESH:D010554), anxiety (MESH:D001007), depression (MESH:D003866)
- **Chemicals:** psylocybin (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11860892/full.md

## References

94 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11860892/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11860892