Stigma Associated with Mental Illness: Perspectives of Judges and Lawyers in Lebanon
R. Mroue, M. Cherro, G. Kassir, N. Dandan, E. Ghossoub

TL;DR
This study explores the stigma toward mental illness among Lebanese judges and lawyers, finding that education and personal experience can influence attitudes.
Contribution
The study is the first to assess mental health stigma among Lebanese legal professionals, highlighting the role of education and personal exposure.
Findings
Participants with personal or familial experience with mental illness showed more positive attitudes.
Feeling adequately educated about mental health was linked to lower perceived stigma.
Most legal professionals in Lebanon lack formal mental health training.
Abstract
Legal professionals frequently encounter forensic mental health issues in the criminal justice system. These issues can significantly impact the outcome of cases, making it essential to understand the attitudes and perceptions of these experts towards mental illness. Despite a high number of individuals with mental illness in prisons, the availability of forensic mental health services is limited. While prior research has shown widespread stigma towards mental illness, there hasn’t been a study assessing the attitudes of judges and lawyers. This study aims to investigate the stigma related to mental health among Lebanese legal professionals. An online questionnaire was sent to judges and lawyers practicing in Lebanon. The survey included a section on demographics and personal data with the following scales: Reported and intended behavior scale (RIBS) which measures mental health…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Treatment and Access
