Unitarity or multiplicity of the psychosis: neverending question in psychopathology
J. J. Martínez Jambrina

TL;DR
The paper explores whether psychosis exists as a continuous spectrum or distinct categories, reviewing key perspectives from leading psychiatrists and evolutionary considerations.
Contribution
A synthesis of dimensional, historical, and evolutionary approaches to psychosis, emphasizing individual variability and holistic assessment.
Findings
Jim van Os advocates a dimensional model of psychosis with transdiagnostic boundaries.
Germán Berrios highlights historical and cultural variability in psychotic experiences.
Bartolomé Llopis calls for comprehensive assessments that include individual context.
Abstract
Introduce the topic of the continuity of psychoses and its relevance in contemporary psychiatry. Present authors as Henry EY, Jim van Os and Germán Berrios as key figures in the discussion on this topic, highlighting Ey, Dr. Jim van Os’s significant contributions to the understanding of the continuum of psychosis, Germán Berrios’s historical and cultural perspectives, and the importance of Bartolomé Llopis’s critical viewpoint. We also review the evolutionary approach about mental disorders as a keypoint in this discussion. Introduce the topic of the continuity of psychoses and its relevance in contemporary psychiatry. Present authors as Henry EY, Jim van Os and Germán Berrios as key figures in the discussion on this topic, highlighting Ey, Dr. Jim van Os’s significant contributions to the understanding of the continuum of psychosis, Germán Berrios’s historical and cultural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health and Psychiatry · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
