Сhronotype and health related quality of life among undergraduate university students
E. L. Nikolaev, I. Poverinov, M. Alhasan

TL;DR
This study finds that most university students have an intermediate chronotype, and morning chronotypes report better health-related quality of life, except for mental health.
Contribution
The study establishes a link between morning chronotype and higher health-related quality of life in university students.
Findings
71.2% of students have an intermediate chronotype.
Morning chronotype is associated with higher health-related quality of life indicators like General Health and Vitality.
Mental Health and Bodily Pain are not connected with chronotype.
Abstract
Chronotype represents genetically determined behavioral characteristics of a person’s twenty-four-hour activity. Research shows that a person’s chronotype is interrelated with their mental health. Are there similar connections with general health and health related quality of life? To establish how various chronotypes are represented in university students and if there are any interrelations between chronotypes and health‐related quality of life We used SF-12 Health Survey и Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) by Horne and Ostberg to survey 305 university students of both genders. The results showed that the majority of the students (71.2%) have an intermediate chronotype. The second goes a moderate morning chronotype (17.7%), the third – a moderate evening chronotype (9.8%). Definite morning and definite evening chronotypes were revealed in less than 1% of the students.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth and Well-being Studies · Health and Wellbeing Research
