Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Boran Tekdogan, Jérôme Martineau, Miroslava Verbat, Edward T. C. Dong, Daniel Correia, Carlo M. Oranges

TL;DR
This study compares outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions, finding similar complication rates despite longer surgery times and hospital stays for bilateral procedures.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the comparative safety and outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions based on a single-center retrospective analysis.
Findings
Bilateral DIEP flap procedures had significantly longer operative times and hospital stays compared to unilateral procedures.
There were no significant differences in complication rates between unilateral and bilateral reconstructions.
Chemotherapy was more common in patients undergoing bilateral reconstructions.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Cleft Lip and Palate Research · Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
